[governance] Digital restrictions management in HTML standards

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<CAOLD2+Y=szx6oOaY79gYuwNqojYrCykkdOwyjW9xEZcX7UvDqQ at mail.gmail.com>, at 
06:18:04 on Thu, 16 May 2013, Andrea Glorioso <andrea at digitalpolicy.it> 
writes

> isn't a membership organisation which allows multiple stakeholders to 
>become members, a multi-stakeholder organisation?

As a piece of Internet Governance jargon, multi-stakeholder has come to 
mean every-stakeholder. We would need a new name for several-stakeholder 
(or even many-stakeholder) organisations.

For example, if Governments ceased attending ICANN meetings, I think it 
would no longer be truly "multi"-stakeholder (despite the large number 
of remaining stakeholders).

-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t