[governance] Digital restrictions management in HTML standards

[Carlos A. Afonso]

Who in our caucus is participating in WWW 2013 in Rio? There will be workshops on this issue.

--c.a.

ps: I will not, as I have another commitment out of Rio.

------------
C. A. Afonso

-------- Mensagem original --------
De : José Félix Arias Ynche <jaryn56 at gmail.com> 
Data: 13/05/2013  16h50  (GMT-03:00) 
Para: governance at lists.igcaucus.org,Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net> 
Assunto: Re: [governance] Digital restrictions management in HTML standards 
 
Estoy de acuerdo con una encuesta, de ese modo se obtendrá información necesaria para    
utilizar lo apropiado.



 



Cordialmente:         José Félix Arias Ynche
                        Investigador Social Para El Desarrollo


2013/5/13 Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net>
That would possibly be equivalent to endorsing something without actually understanding it in enough detail to make an informed decision?

--srs (iPad)

On 13-May-2013, at 15:15, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:

> McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If Members feel strongly about this, then perhaps joining the W3c
>> HTML5 WG might be more effective.
>
> It might be more effective still to do that *and* in addition write and
> dissiminate a statement that explains the concerns, as well as W3C's
> processes and the necessary skills for effective participation in W3C
> WGs, and calls on civil society organizations who agree with the points
> of concern to engage through the relevant processes of W3C.
>
> I agree that in comparison to actually working through the available
> processes, endorsing a petition is not likely to have a great effect.
> On the other hand, endorsing a petition is also much less work than
> engaging in a technical WG.
>
> So I think that the likely greater effectiveness of engaging in the
> HTML5 WG is not a valid reason for IGC not to endorse the petition, as
> was proposed.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
> --
> Recommendations for effective and contructive participation in IGC:
> 1. Respond to the content of assertions and arguments, not to the person
> 2. Be conservative in what you send, be liberal in what you accept
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130513/a311151d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t