[governance] Digital restrictions management in HTML standards

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Unless you have a majority opinion in the igc it would be more appropriate 
to use avri's wording

Without a poll, we do not have enough positive or negative response to 
determine rough consensus in this case

--srs (htc one x)



On 12 May 2013 9:55:09 AM parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>
> On Saturday 11 May 2013 06:39 PM, Avri Doria wrote:
> > Sent while incomplete.
> >
> > Oh my!
> >
> > Please if Parminder finds the suggestion so unpleasant, consider it 
> withdrawn.
> > I do no to wish to displease him any further.
> > Or deal with the consequences of displeasing him.
>
> You have a very inappropriate way of personalisation of political 
> discussions! But I guess that is you!
>
> parminder
> >
> > But if it possible for the rest of you to edit it to somethings that 
> works you,
> > cheers and good on you.
> >
> > avri
> >
> > On 11 May 2013, at 09:06, Avri Doria wrote:
> >
> >> oh my!
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10 May 2013, at 23:36, parminder wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Friday 10 May 2013 02:16 PM, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> >>>> [with IGC coordinator hat on]
> >>>>
> >>>> Are there any objections to Avri's proposal below?
> >>>  From Avri's proposes template " The IGC is ...*. The participants in 
> the IGC support this petition. "
> >>>
> >>> Dont understand what it means.... to me it means all participants in 
> IGC support, which means IGC supports......
> >>>
> >>> And if there is a typo and it is meant to say "the following or 
> undersigned participants in the IGC support the petition"
> >>>
> >>> I am not sure how this in between category works, to me either (1) IGC 
> is supporting something or (2) a set of individuals/ orgs are supporting 
> something with no reference to IGC
> >>>
> >>> What is bar to qualify for this new in-between category, indicated b 
> Avri's framing...... Can, for instance,  I and a friend, also on the IGC 
> list, build up a statement and say,
> >>>
> >>> "The IGC is ....... . The following  participants in the IGC support 
> this petition".
> >>>
> >>> My view: either IGC supports something and otherwise there is no 
> mention of IGC...
> >>>
> >>> parminder
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> (If we have consensus on this general course of action, I think that
> >>>> the next steps on this would be informal editing and then a consensus
> >>>> process to create a bit of fluff text on what is the IGC etc., to go
> >>>> along with with the sentence that expresses support for the petition.)
> >>>>
> >>>> Greetings,
> >>>> Norbert
> >>>>
> >>>> Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote on 28 Apr 2013:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I have personally signed and would support a statement if we could
> >>>>> say something that like:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "
> >>>>> The IGC is ...*.
> >>>>> The participants in the IGC support this petition.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> signed
> >>>>> {set of those who endorse - individuals and organizational
> >>>>> participants} "
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any more and we would probably be involved in substantive issues.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> avri
> >>>>>
> >>>>> * do we have a canned "who the IGC is" stmt - or is that a
> >>>>> substantive issue?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 28 Apr 2013, at 18:00, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> What are the views about the idea of in addition issuing a brief
> >>>>>> IGC statement in support of this petition or with a message similar
> >>>>>> to it?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Greetings,
> >>>>>> Norbert
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Many people here may wish to sign this petition.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5
> >>>>>>>
> >>>
> >>> ____________________________________________________________
> >>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> >>>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> >>> To be removed from the list, visit:
> >>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> >>>
> >>> For all other list information and functions, see:
> >>>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> >>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> >>>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> >>>
> >>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> >
>
>



-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t