[governance] advisors added to WG on enhanced cooperation?

[Roland Perry]

In message 
<CAFabd1Jv+m8sEePQiC4czi8TUAnauetnc2mtZEhnEWN0dkN4_g at mail.gmail.com>, at 
22:40:15 on Fri, 10 May 2013, Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp> writes
>Hearing rumors that "advisors" are being appointed to the CSTD working
>group on enhanced cooperation.
>
>We go through hoops to have people appointed, rip ourselves (and
>others) apart over the process, and then it seems there might be an
>unaccountable back-door.
>
>I am sure well intentioned, but I think a really bad idea.  Could our
>members on the WG find out the truth to this rumor.  Before the group
>meets.  And if turns out to be correct I hope we'll ask that the
>practice is stopped.

Be careful what you wish for. "Civil Society bans people who understand 
about the issues, from participating in CSTD working group" won't win 
many supporters.
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t