[governance] Fwd: Final composition of the CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

I have no particular objection - but then I don't have any particular agenda of trying to exclude specific people from other stakeholder communities either, so I'm probably the wrong person to ask that question.

--srs (iPad)

On 29-Mar-2013, at 22:19, McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> wrote:

> Suresh,
> 
> I would think that the folk who are active in these networks would
> also be eligible, no?
> 
> http://www.internet2.edu/international/reachable/
> 
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
> <suresh at hserus.net> wrote:
>> Tried to find out exactly what internet2 does and what its membership is,
>> before asking all these questions?
>> 
>> No?  I thought not .. http://www.internet2.edu/membership/index.cfm
>> 
>> --srs (iPad)
>> 
>> 
>> On 29-Mar-2013, at 21:48, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> On Friday 29 March 2013 08:03 PM, McTim wrote:
>> 
>> <snip>
>> 
>> 
>> you are incorrect.  The folk who are involved in Internet2, amongst
>> 
>> other REN projects are EXACTLY those people that the FP would include.
>> 
>> 
>> So you are saying that members of Internet2 fit the definition of technical
>> (and academic) community that the focal point gave us which is "community of
>> organizations and individuals who are involved in the day-to-day operational
>> management of the Internet and who work within this community" ? You think
>> that Internet2 is involved in 'day to say operational management of the
>> Internet'?
>> 
>> 
>> And that therefore Internet2 members could have been considered as nominees
>> from the technical and academic community by the focal point for the WG on
>> EC?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Strange that they qualify for OECD body as technical community but not for
>> 
>> the UN system.....
>> 
>> 
>> Evidently, the definition of even the technical community part of the
>> 
>> 'technical and academic community' employed by the Focal point is erronoeus,
>> 
>> what to say about the 'academic community' part which seem to have simply
>> 
>> been banished.
>> 
>> but they haven't been, you are simply mistaken.
>> 
>> 
>> How am I mistaken? Who is the academic community member in the final list?
>> Like someone not closely associated with ISOC and not running a country tld
>> whereby one qualifies through the above definition of being engaged in 'day
>> to day operational management of the Internet'?
>> 
>> 
>> parminder
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> 
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>> 
>>   governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> 
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>> 
>>   http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>> 
>> 
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>> 
>>   http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> 
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>> 
>>   http://www.igcaucus.org/
>> 
>> 
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> 
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t