[governance] Call for Consensus [Draft Workshop Proposals]

[Fouad Bajwa]

Hi All,

Though you have my support for both proposals but they need more work
and carry very generic titles. In the first workshop proposal, its
very open ended. This is bound to be merged with something else.

In the second proposal, there is significant work from APC about
Spectrum for Development and this proposal should be revisited to be
more focused because there is  a possibility that it will be either
merged around with something about the history of the Internet etc or
something. Should I have been on the MAG, I would have had to push
these two proposals into mergers.

+ 1 Workshop Proposal 1 - Reform topic to be more focused. Work with
proposed partners to improve the working title - You may want to
explore Multistakeholderism and the evolution of Internet Principles
or something

+ 1 Workshop Proposal 2 - The history of Telecomes, reforms, de
regularization, spectrum for development, impacts on the future can
come into making this more focused.

Best

Fouad

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Tapani Tarvainen
<tapani.tarvainen at effi.org> wrote:
> +1 proposal 1
> +1 proposal 2
>
> --
> Tapani Tarvainen
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:11:44AM +1200, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro (salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Firstly, thank you to all those that have been commenting on the types of
>> Workshops and nature of Workshops that the IGC should co-host. We have
>> compiled the Workshop templates into a single document for your ease of
>> reading as there are multiple threads on the issues.
>>
>>
>> There are two Draft Proposals that are attached:-
>>
>>
>>    - Workshop Proposal 1
>>    - Workshop Proposal 2
>>
>> Kindly advise us of your view on these Draft Workshop Proposals through the
>> following means:-
>>
>>
>> *If you Agree with Workshop Proposal 1 then say:*
>>
>> + 1 Workshop Proposal 1
>>
>> *If you Disagree with Workshop Proposal 1 then say:*
>>
>> -1 Workshop Proposal
>>
>>
>> You can do the same for Workshop Proposal 2. Your views matter, so please
>> make them known. If you have substantive comments to make on the thematics
>> of the workshop, I would graciously ask that you please pick up on previous
>> threads where the workshops was discussed and comment there. As much as
>> possible, please leave this thread uncluttered so it is easier to collect
>> responses.
>>
>> We would like to wrap this up by 1300 UTC on 21st March, 2013 to allow us
>> to submit the same on time.
>>
>>
>> Thank you.
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> Sala
>> *(co-coordinator)*
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t