[governance] Workshop Proposals - a few days to go

[Adam Peake]

Norbert,

Anriette proposed the workshop, already working on it.  Would much
prefer she continued during the preliminary stage (and I am sure many
of us will help) and we can talk about who will take over the
organization of the full workshop later.  And I am sure APC is already
busy with workshops, sessions etc, so would only suggest this as the
way forward until the April 30 date for full proposals.

and, frankly, I think more diplomatic at this time to have Anriette
handle this.

Adam



On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 5:42 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> Deal all
>
> Anriette's proposal looks very good to me. If this is agreeable to all
> who are concerned, including in particular Anriette and the IGC, I'd
> volunteer to serve as co-organizer on behalf of the IGC.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
>
> Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
>
>> Dear all
>>
>> Here is the description of the workshop I proposed. I have included
>> and built on Nnenna's suggestions.
>>
>> Anriette
>>
>> Proposed title:
>>
>> "From lessons learnt to good practice: Strengthening accountability
>> and transparency in MS processes"
>>
>> Such a workshop could be jointly convened by the three
>> non-governmental stakeholder groups in the IGF and used to share
>> experiences, raise concerns, and try and identify good practice
>> approaches. We could also discuss the composition of these
>> constituency groups, including ambiguity around the definitions of
>> the TA community and the challenges that arise at times in CS from
>> having a mix of organisational members and individual CS activists
>> and analysts.
>>
>> The outcomes of discussion at the workshop could become an input to
>> the CSTD WG on EC.
>>
>> The objectives of the workshop could be defined as follows (building
>> on the remarks of Nnenna Nwakanma on the IGC list):
>>
>>
>> 1. Highlight lessons learned from our involvement in multi-stakeholder
>> processes
>>
>> 2. Explore what has worked or not worked in terms of how stakeholder
>> groups are defined and represented
>>
>> 3. Build a common understanding on what would constitute sufficient
>> transparency, openness and inclusion in such processes and discuss
>> possible principles to work from
>>
>> 4. Propose working methods for going forward
>>
>> 4. Deepen the Enhanced Cooperation discussion and contribute a working
>> document to the CSTD WG on EC.
>>
>>
>> Discussion between the three groups could potentially begin in the
>> build up to the IGF. There is certainly interest on the IGC list to
>> initiate such discussion. We could also use the opportunity of the
>> next IGF open consultation to have a face to face discussion.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t