[governance] CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation

[michael gurstein]

Adam, not that I have a record of... I am scrutinizing my "in" and "out"
boxes at bit more carefully of late.

M

-----Original Message-----
From: apeake at gmail.com [mailto:apeake at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Adam Peake
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 4:47 AM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
Subject: Re: [governance] CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation

Michael, you've sent this to the list twice.

Adam



On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 6:12 PM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Whoops... just woke up... long day, week, month...
>
> Memo to self: be careful how you address memo's to self (note's for 
> blogpost ... :)
>
> M
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: michael gurstein [mailto:gurstein at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 8:47 PM
> To: 'governance at lists.igcaucus.org'; 'McTim'; 'parminder'
> Subject: RE: [governance] CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation
>
> So, the issue now is nobody wants to hurt ISOC's feelings :(... 
> complete BS of course... but that is the story that Constance peddled 
> and Anriette picked up and moved along...
>
> The other story, what is just and proper doesn't seem to have as much 
> resonance (among a bunch of milquetoasts... and the real story which 
> is about arrogance and power which is "my" story is too strong for 
> anyone to deal with much...
>
> Not sure I see anyway to do much about this ...
>
> My suggestion is to at this point just wait... whatever will happen 
> will happen and I'm not sure that we can do much to make it happen at 
> this point...
>
> M
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org
> [mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] On Behalf Of McTim
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2013 8:24 PM
> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; parminder
> Subject: Re: [governance] CSTD Working Group on Enhanced Cooperation
>
> On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:00 PM, parminder 
> <parminder at itforchange.net>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Monday 18 March 2013 08:29 PM, Adam Peake wrote:
>>>
>>> I doubt that will work.  There's much to do, that why there are two 
>>> coordinators.  In my experience.
>>
>>
>> Great that you are such a stickler for process and propriety. BTW, 
>> that does it make it a little odd that you are not at all 
>> enthusiastic about requesting some simple definitional clarifications 
>> from those who recently managed the very public process
>
> It was hardly public, and ours wasn't either (until after the fact).
>
>
> of appointing members of an important public
>> body. What is it that saying about sauce, geese and gander......
>
> I think that the phrase you are looking for is "those who live in 
> glass houses....."
>
> FWIW, I don't think we should be writing to anyone to cast aspersions 
> on other SGs.
>
> --
> Cheers,
>
> McTim
> "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A 
> route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>



-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t