[governance] Workshops proposals for IGF was Re: [] COMMENTS SOUGHT: ...

[Avri Doria]

On 19 Mar 2013, at 06:26, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

> I am ok with Anriette's wording.
> 
> For #1 - sorry but its been a long day and its not clear whether you support it or not :)


Neither am I.


I agree that there are a lot of important topics chunked under the heading Network Neutrality.

I think it is a heading that has outlived its usefulness and so sort of agree with you, but until i have seen a proposal for a topic am not sure I support it.  

One concern I have on the topic is declarations on the technical necessity for things like DPI.  It is too easy to say, it is necessary and thus not a concern.  One of the topics I think we need to explore is the balance between the creation of tools that seem necessary for technical purposes and the potential harm these tools cause  when misused

avri


DPI - Deep Packet Inspection.
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t