[governance] Request for an appeal to the decision to write to the T&A Focal Point

[McTim]

I hereby request the appeal team to review the decision of Norbert as
co-co to write to ISOC as he did.

It was unwarranted, there was no consensus claimed or gauged, in fact
there was considerable
division on the list as to our role in their process.

I think an apology is in order to the T&A Focal Point for our
coordinator writing to her with his IGC hat on, he should include in
his apology that the IGC did not authorise him to write to her nor did
we authorise an accusation of a HR violation.

>From our Charter:

"Duties of the appeals team.

Any time 4 individual members of the IGC co-sign a statement on the
main IGC mailing list they can appeal any decision of the
coordinators. When a decision is appealed, the appeals team will
review any discussions that occurred and will request comments from
the IGC membership. Based on the information they collect and
discussion, they will decide on the merit of the appeal.
Decisions by the appeals team are based on a majority vote of the
appeal team, i.e., three (3) or ore votes, except in the case of
coordinator recall which requires full consensus.
The decision of the appeals team will be final on every decision reviewed."


I ask IGC Members to support this appeal.



-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t