[governance] Prism MI6 y la CIA,

Chaitanya Dhareshwar chaitanyabd at gmail.com
Tue Jun 11 23:44:31 EDT 2013 

Translation from translate.google.com

*Well until about public hiso (FISA) that knew what he was doing long ago
by the mouth, or rather "out of the closet"*
* *
*What we have to choose for ethics, and that we have to claim but "and" is
that our intelligence is our own country that we spy and not a foreigner.*
* *
*And as we do that, our government easy to tell which wall works NSA
intelligence, to stop favoring the company / s telephony, which gives us
communication technology and Internet, which works in secret conjunction
with providing NSA has access huge amounts of data of all its users*
* *
*And why this happens; simple hub node and all communications wrapper is
stationed in the U.S.*
*Those found in Europe, Asia, Africa, Latin America and others are screen,
but ask yourself why the governments of European countries have protested
the surveillance and spying, clear quietly.*
*And that I do not speak for Google, Facebook, Hotmail, Yahoo and others.*
* *
*But who is (FISA)? It is the Court InteligenciaExtranjera Surveillance
CIA, which gave the nod to the other agencies of the U.S. intelligence so
that through the powerful Secret Project (PRISM) to obtain unlimited, data
becomes cyber surveillance, access email, chat records, stored data, voice
traffic, file transfer and network data worldwide social.*
*"PRISM" has tentacles programs that are responsible for collecting data
fiber cables, previous data streams, telephone interception, satellite
surveillance and countries suspected suspects (those who do not cooperate)
and so many other reasons for monitoring and espionage create is to be made
and make*
*Of course this will be denied and many of us and even government people
will deny it, but at this point ... who believes whom?*
* *
*And this I knew all governments and their intelligence agencies and those
who claim to fight for a free Internet.*
* *
*Well after this boys hang on and I'll be, and we'll be in the sights of
our intelligence, which is also chuponeado by the CIA, NSA PRIMS and other
intelligence services.*
* *
*I think I'm going to Hong Kong ...*
**
**
**

*Sincerely: José Félix Arias Ynche
                         Social Research for Development*


On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 5:47 AM, José Félix Arias Ynche
<jaryn56 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Bueno hasta que se hiso público lo de (FISA) que se sabía lo que hacia
> hace mucho tiempo por boca, mejor dicho “salió del closet”
>
>
>
> Lo que nosotros tenemos que escoger por ética, y eso lo tenemos que
> reclamar  pero “ya”, es que sea nuestro servicio de inteligencia de nuestro
> respectivo país el que nos espíe y no un extranjero.
>
>
>
> Y como podemos lograr eso, fácil decirle a nuestro gobierno el cual
> trabaja en pared con inteligencia de la NSA, que deje de favorecer a la
> empresa/s de  telefonía, que nos brinda la tecnología de comunicación y de
> Internet, el cual trabaja en secreto conjuntamente con la NSA  brindándoles
> el acceso ha enormes cantidades de datos de todos sus usuarios
>
>
>
> Y porque sucede esto; simple, el nodo concentrador y derivador de todas
> sus comunicaciones se encuentra estacionado en EE.UU.
>
> Los que se encuentran en Europa, Asia, África, Latinoamérica y otros son
> de pantalla, sino pregúntense el porque los gobiernos de países de Europa
> han protestado por la vigilancia y espionaje, claro en voz baja.
>
> Y  eso que no hablo de Google, Facebook, Hotmail, Yahoo y otros.
>
>
>
> ¿Pero quien es (FISA)? Es el Tribunal de la CIA de Vigilancia de
> Inteligencia*Extranjera, *el cual dio el visto bueno a las demás agencias
> de inteligencia de los EE.UU. para que a través del Proyecto Secreto de
> gran alcance (PRISM) se obtenga ilimitadamente; datos, se haga vigilancia
> cibernética, acceso al correo electrónico, registros de chat, los datos
> almacenados, el tráfico de voz, transferencia de archivos y los datos de
> redes sociales en todo el mundo.
>
> “PRISM” cuenta con programas tentáculos que se encargan de recoger datos
> de los cables de fibra, flujos de datos anteriores, Interceptación
> telefónica, vigilancia por satélite a sospechosos y países sospechosos (los
> que no cooperan) y tantos otros motivos de vigilancia y espionaje que crean
> se deba hacer y hacer
>
> Claro que esto se va a negar y muchos de nosotros y hasta gente del
> gobierno saldrán a desmentirlo, pero a estas alturas… ¿quien cree a quien?
>
>
>
>
> Y esto lo sabían todos los gobiernos y sus respectivas agencias de
> inteligencia y los que dicen luchar por una Internet libre.
>
>
>
> Bueno después de esto agárrense muchachos ya que voy a estar, y vamos a
> estar en la mira de nuestro servicio de inteligencia, el cual también es
> chuponeado por la CIA, NSA PRIMS y otros servicios de inteligencia.
>
>
>
> *Creo que me voy a Hong Kong...*
>
>
> *Cordialmente:         José Félix Arias Ynche*
> *                        Investigador Social Para El Desarrollo*
>
>
> 2013/6/11 Deirdre Williams <williams.deirdre at gmail.com>
>
>> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22860239
>>
>> US surveillance: Trading secrecy for public trust?[image: Gordon Corera]By
>> Gordon CoreraSecurity correspondent, BBC News
>> [image: GCHQ]The foreign secretary has insisted that GCHQ operates
>> within a strict legal framework
>> Continue reading the main story<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22860239#story_continues_1>Related Stories
>>
>>    - Q&A: Prism and privacy<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-22839609>
>>    - Profile: Edward Snowden<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-22837100>
>>
>> Squaring secrecy and accountability is not a new challenge. But the
>> information that Edward Snowden has put into the public domain has raised
>> serious questions about how open the state should be when it comes to
>> surveillance.
>>
>> UK Foreign Secretary William Hague was forced to respond to allegations
>> about a secret US spy programme Prism and the idea that Britain's GCHQ had
>> used it to evade the law.
>>
>> There is no doubt that GCHQ and America's National Security Agency enjoy
>> a close, even intimate relationship.
>>
>> Information is shared as a matter of course in a way that does not happen
>> between MI6 and the CIA, their counterparts in the human intelligence world.
>>
>> Mr Hague tried to deal head on with concerns that this relationship had
>> been used to swerve the law, but he did so without mentioning Prism or
>> providing any real details, other than a blanket assurance that no laws had
>> been broken and the system of accountability and oversight was strong.
>>
>> In other words, the public was asked to take his answers on trust.
>> Patriot Act
>>
>> The foreign secretary said GCHQ operated under a legal framework.
>>
>> When I asked one official to explain the legal framework they pointed me
>> to two pieces of legislation - the Intelligence Services Act of 1994 and
>> the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.
>> Continue reading the main story<http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22860239#story_continues_2>“Start
>> Quote
>>
>> The lack of information in the public domain may well have suited the
>> state in the past, but the consequences now in terms of public trust could
>> be serious”
>>
>> But when I then started to ask how those two pieces of legislation
>> (written in the early days of the internet age and long before Twitter and
>> social media) applied to the different forms of modern communication, they
>> said they could not go any further.
>>
>> In other words a legal framework exists, but how it is interpreted and
>> applied by government remains secret.
>>
>> A similar issue exists in the US. There are sweeping powers under the
>> Patriot Act and other pieces of legislation to gather information. But the
>> way in which these are actually used is not public.
>>
>> So for instance when the government requests that telecoms company
>> Verizon passes on huge volumes of call data on Americans, it is done
>> through a secret order the public would not have known about without Edward
>> Snowden's revelations.
>>
>> Governments and intelligence agencies say this has to be the case because
>> too much information about what communications they are intercepting can
>> tip off hostile actors such as terrorists who will then modify their
>> behaviour.
>>
>> Some analysts already claim that is happening now.
>>
>> "Jihadists are now actively sharing the reporting from the Washington
>> Post and Guardian on Prism and recommending increased security measures in
>> their operations," according to IntelCenter, which monitors jihadist
>> communications.
>>
>> "Among the recommended measures are ceasing the use of services listed in
>> the Washington Post and Guardian reports, increased use of encryption tools
>> and other operational security and tradecraft measures designed to
>> significantly impede efforts by intelligence agencies to identify and
>> monitor their activities."
>> Outrage
>>
>> Against the argument that the revelations damage national security,
>> though, is the counter-argument that the public have a right to know what
>> is done in their name by institutions they pay for and which are supposed
>> to be accountable to them.
>> [image: Edward Snowden (pic: The Guardian)]Whistleblower Edward Snowden
>> has fled to Hong Kong following his revelations
>>
>> Especially if those actions might involve surveillance of the domestic
>> public itself.
>>
>> Members of the public do not have much idea what the state is able to do
>> when it comes to surveillance. And the state in the past has wanted to keep
>> it that way.
>>
>> But the downsides of this are now becoming more apparent.
>>
>> When the UK's Communications Data Bill emerged (known to critics as the
>> "snoopers' charter"), there was outrage in some quarters at the idea that
>> the government was seeking information about people's phone calls and
>> emails (although not the content).
>>
>> What many did not realise was that the government already had this power
>> and used it extensively (half a million requests in 2011 were made for
>> communications data) and the new bill was simply a way of expanding it into
>> new forms of online communication and mandating that certain types of
>> information was kept by companies.
>>
>> Similarly with Prism, some people were shocked that the state might be
>> getting information from companies like Google and Microsoft and did not
>> realise the state could already do this using court orders and warrants.
>>
>> The lack of information in the public domain may well have suited the
>> state in the past, but the consequences now in terms of public trust could
>> be serious, particularly when faced with a partial release of certain
>> documents by a whistleblower keen to make his point.
>>
>> Governments in the UK and US will now have to look at whether the
>> potential loss in capability by talking more about the activities of the
>> state is nonetheless necessary in order to ensure public confidence - not
>> just in the intelligence services, but the democratic system as a whole.
>>
>> --
>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William
>> Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130612/01a921a1/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

More information about the Governance mailing list