[governance] Have there been any statements re: PRISM from the "technical community"

[McTim]

On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Kerry Brown <kerry at kdbsystems.com> wrote:

> I don't know if this counts as the "technical community" but it does
> provide a plausible technical scenario.
>
> As an aside I am really getting tired of the us vs. them conversations. We
> are a community that is made up of communities. Many people have their
> fingers in many communities. There is a lot of overlap. Trying to reduce
> every conversation to sides is not useful and only causes division when we
> should be seeking unification and consensus.
>

I agree wholeheartedly!

As I said before, it is doubtful there is a "technical community" rep who
can meaningfully make a statement on behalf of the tens/hundreds of
thousands of people who can be said to be "T&A", despite MG wanting a
statement.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130610/70157ebe/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t