[governance] Revised Draft IGC Statement #DRM in HTML5

[Avri Doria]

I support sending this statement.


avri


On 6 Jun 2013, at 04:52, Adam Peake wrote:

> Hi Sala, 
> 
> To be honest, having to remember a url and jump off to a separate site for such a small statement is a pain.  In my opinion, anyway.  Perhaps you can see the stats on the http://www.igcaucus.org/ page, how many people bother to visit vs the very large number who read the list?

as the website does not allow for editing, but only for commenting, I find that tool inadequate to IGC statement creation purposes.


> 
> A cleaned up version of a short statement:


> 
> The Civil Society Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) endorses and supports the formal objection lodged by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) <https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg>
> 
> We believe that the inclusion of digital rights management in HTML5 has the potential to stifle innovation and we object to the inclusion of digital rights management (DRM) in HTML5.
> 
> We fully endorse the arguments raised by the EFF in their statement "EFF's Formal Objection to the HTML WG Draft Charter" <https://www.eff.org/pages/drm/w3c-formal-objection-html-wg>


> 
> The EFF statement we're considering to support is itself long and speaks for itself.  See no need to add more than above.

Indeed, lets just support them.


> 
> Adam
> 
> 


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t