[governance] Re: Draft Statement #DRM HTML5/ was [Should the IGC support Formal Objection by EFF?] #DRM in HTML5

[Carlos A. Afonso]

Jeremy suggested a replacement, not simply dropping it. He suggested 
dropping another para.

I agree with him.

--c.a.

On 06/02/2013 10:22 AM, McTim wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 2 Jun 2013, at 08:34, Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro wrote:
>>
>>> We believe that the inclusion of digital rights management in HTML5 will kill innovation and we strongly object to the inclusion of digital rights management (DRM) in HTML5.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks for highlighting this sentence. While I have issues with some of the others that I need to think through, this one stands out as problematic for me.
>>
>> I think that 'innovation' is one of those unidentifiables that everyone invokes in their statements no matter what position they are taking.
>>
>> - those advocating DRM say that without the money that DRM enables no one would innovate at all (i disagree btw)
>>
>> - those opposing DRM say that without the work of others to learn from and build upon we would kill innovation.  I  disagree, sure it makes innovation more challenging and is the wrong thing to do, but kill it?  I don't think so.
>
>
> of course not, it's overblown hyperbole.  'Stymie" or "hinder" are
> better words, or just drop the para per Jeremy.
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t