AW: [governance] Potential IGC letter to US gov (was Re: NET NEUTRALITY AND MORE)

["Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"]

I agree with Bill, what ICANN has to do as the next step to clarify the procedures for the communication, coordination and collaboration in an enhanced PDP amont ALL stakewholders involved in ICANN, INCLUDING the GAC. This could be in a form of an AoC (or a FoC). 
 
BTW, a good issue both for the Durban workshop as well as for ATLAS II.
 
wolfgang
 
 

________________________________

Von: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org im Auftrag von William Drake
Gesendet: Sa 01.06.2013 15:46
An: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Mawaki Chango
Cc: Avri Doria; John Curran
Betreff: Re: [governance] Potential IGC letter to US gov (was Re: NET NEUTRALITY AND MORE)


Hi Mawaki 

On Jun 1, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Mawaki Chango <kichango at gmail.com> wrote:


	Would a multilateral AoC between ICANN and GAC make sense?


I'd argue a multistakeholder one evolved from the current structure if/as greater confidence and trust are built would be better.  This has been a subject of some consideration in relevant capitals, IGF sessions, etc.

Cheers

Bill 

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t