[bestbits] [governance] Re: [IRPCoalition] IGF - and the corporatisation scandal

[William Drake]

> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> 
> Date: 07/29/2013 1:48 AM (GMT+05:30) 
> To: parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> 
> Cc: governance at lists.igcaucus.org,"<,bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>," <bestbits at lists.bestbits.net>,irp at lists.internetrightsandprinciples.org 
> Subject: Re: [bestbits] Re: [governance] Re: [IRPCoalition] IGF - and the corporatisation scandal 
> 
> 
> This document has never, to my knowledge, been made available to the
> MAG. Other MAG members on these lists can confirm or provide contrary
> information.

confirm

> Has anyone actually read this proposal in full? Assuming it is an
> official proposal (which is just an assumption) it does not actually
> offer proper speaking slots for cash at all. With the possible exception
> of private sector sponsors being able to 'nominate' speakers for closing
> ceremony. As I said earlier, the MAG has not seen this document (unless
> I missed it).
> 
> But I don't see how this is a new model. Or am I missing something?

No you are not

Bill
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t