[governance] WG: Final deadline and requirements for workshop proposal completeness

Ginger Paque ginger at paque.net
Wed Jul 17 07:03:40 EDT 2013


NO! Definitely not official--that is my own personal suggestion. For our
workshop, I found that my preferred discussants could not always confirm
they would be in Bali. So I asked them to confirm they would
participate--and that if they could not be in Bali physically, that they
would join us remotely. For me, this was a way to confirm my panel
participants, even though they did not yet have funding to travel to Bali.
Chengetai did confirm that this is a viable option and that remote
presenters will have tech support.
Best, Ginger


On 17 July 2013 02:23, Chaitanya Dhareshwar <chaitanyabd at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ginger is that an official proviso - as I don't remember it being there in
> the original request for proposals. Maybe I'm wrong?
>
> -C
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Ginger Paque <ginger at paque.net> wrote:
>
>> with the proviso that they will present remotely if they cannot be in
>> Bali.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130717/04eb9078/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list