[governance] NSA penetrates Brazilian telecom
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Sun Jul 7 08:08:29 EDT 2013
From the below news item;
"As those two articles detail, all of this bulk, indiscriminate
surveillance aimed at populations of friendly foreign nations is
part of the NSA's "FAIRVIEW" program. Under that program, the /*NSA
partners with a large US telecommunications company, the identity of
which is currently unknown, and that US company then partners with
telecoms in the foreign countries (emphasis added). */Those
partnerships allow the US company access to those countries'
telecommunications systems, and that access is then exploited to
direct traffic to the NSA's repositories."
There are basically two large US telecoms AT&T and Verizon... Any such
public private partnership for global snooping is very worrisome.
parminder
On Sunday 07 July 2013 10:10 AM, michael gurstein wrote:
>
>
> The NSA's mass and indiscriminate spying on Brazilians
>
> As it does in many non-adversarial countries, the surveillance agency
> is bulk collecting the communications of millions of citizens of Brazil
>
> The National Security Administration headquarters in Fort Meade,
> Maryland. Whistleblower Edward Snowden worked as a data miner for the
> NSA in Hawaii. Photograph: Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA
>
> I've written an article on NSA surveillance for the front page of the
> Sunday edition of O Globo
> <http://oglobo.globo.com/mundo/eua-espionaram-milhoes-de-mails-ligacoes-de-brasileiros-8940934>,
> the large Brazilian newspaper based in Rio de Janeiro. The article is
> headlined (translated) "US spied on millions of emails and calls of
> Brazilians", and I co-wrote it with Globo reporters Roberto Kaz and
> Jose Casado. The rough translation of the article into English is here
> <http://translate.google.com.br/translate?sl=pt&tl=en&js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Foglobo.globo.com%2Fmundo%2Feua-espionaram-milhoes-de-mails-ligacoes-de-brasileiros-8940934&act=url>.
> The main page of Globo's website lists related NSA
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/nsa> stories: here
> <http://oglobo.globo.com/>.
>
> As the headline suggests, the crux of the main article details how the
> NSA has, for years, systematically tapped into the Brazilian
> telecommunication network and indiscriminately intercepted, collected
> and stored the email and telephone records of millions of Brazilians.
> The story follows an article in Der Spiegel last week
> <http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/nsa-spies-on-500-million-german-data-connections-a-908648.html>,
> written by Laura Poitras and reporters from that paper, detailing the
> NSA's mass and indiscriminate collection of the electronic
> communications of millions of Germans. There are many more populations
> of non-adversarial countries which have been subjected to the same
> type of mass surveillance net by the NSA: indeed, the list of those
> which haven't been are shorter than those which have. The claim that
> any other nation is engaging in anything remotely approaching
> indiscriminate worldwide surveillance of this sort is baseless.
>
> As those two articles detail, all of this bulk, indiscriminate
> surveillance aimed at populations of friendly foreign nations is part
> of the NSA's "FAIRVIEW" program. Under that program, the NSA partners
> with a large US telecommunications company, the identity of which is
> currently unknown, and that US company then partners with telecoms in
> the foreign countries. Those partnerships allow the US company access
> to those countries' telecommunications systems, and that access is
> then exploited to direct traffic to the NSA's repositories. Both
> articles are based on top secret documents provided by Edward Snowden;
> O Globo published several of them.
>
> The vast majority of the GuardianUS's revelations thus far have
> concerned NSA domestic spying: the bulk collection of telephone
> records
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/nsa-phone-records-verizon-court-order>,
> the PRISM program
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/06/us-tech-giants-nsa-data>,
> Obama's presidential directive
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/07/obama-china-targets-cyber-overseas>
> that authorizes domestic use of cyber-operations, the Boundless
> Informant data
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/08/nsa-boundless-informant-global-datamining>
> detailing billions of records collected from US systems, the serial
> falsehoods publicly voiced
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jun/19/fisa-court-oversight-process-secrecy>
> by top Obama officials about the NSA's surveillance schemes, and most
> recently, the bulk collection of email and internet metadata
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jun/27/nsa-data-mining-authorised-obama>
> records for Americans. Future stories in the GuardianUS will largely
> continue to focus on the NSA's domestic spying.
>
> But contrary to what some want to suggest, the privacy rights of
> Americans aren't the only ones that matter. That the US government -
> in complete secrecy - is constructing a ubiquitous spying apparatus
> aimed not only at its own citizens, but /all of the world's citizens/,
> has profound consequences. It erodes, if not eliminates, the ability
> to use the internet with any remnant of privacy or personal security.
> It vests the US government with boundless power over those to whom it
> has no accountability. It permits allies of the US - including
> aggressively oppressive ones - to benefit from indiscriminate spying
> on their citizens' communications. It radically alters the balance of
> power between the US and ordinary citizens of the world. And it sends
> an unmistakable signal to the world that while the US /very minimally
> /values the privacy rights of Americans, it assigns zero value to the
> privacy of everyone else on the planet.
>
> This development - the construction of a worldwide, ubiquitous
> electronic surveillance apparatus - is self-evidently newsworthy,
> extreme, and dangerous. It deserves transparency. People around the
> world have no idea that all of their telephonic and internet
> communications are being collected, stored and analyzed by a distant
> government. But that's exactly what is happening, in secrecy and with
> virtually no accountability. And it is inexorably growing, all in the
> dark. At the very least, it merits public understanding and debate.
> That is now possible thanks solely to these disclosures.
>
>
> The Guardian's reporting
>
> One brief note on the Guardian is merited here: I've been continuously
> amazed by how intrepid, fearless and committed the Guardian's editors
> have been in reporting these NSA stories as effectively and
> aggressively as possible. They have never flinched in reporting these
> stories, have spared no expense in pursuing them, have refused to
> allow vague and baseless government assertions to suppress any of the
> newsworthy revelations, have devoted extraordinary resources to ensure
> accuracy and potency, and have generally been animated by exactly the
> kind of adversarial journalistic ethos that has been all too lacking
> over the last decade or so (see this Atlantic article
> <http://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2013/07/the-british-are-coming-and-theyve-brought-newspapers/277486/>
> from yesterday highlighting the role played by the Guardian US's
> editor-in-chief, Janine Gibson).
>
> I don't need to say any of this, but do so only because it's so true
> and impressive: they deserve a lot of credit for the impact these
> stories have had. To underscore that: because we're currently working
> on so many articles involving NSA domestic spying, it would have been
> weeks, at least, before we would have been able to publish this story
> about indiscriminate NSA surveillance of Brazilians. Rather than sit
> on such a newsworthy story - especially at a time when Latin America,
> for several
> <http://news.yahoo.com/bolivia-plane-incident-infuriates-latin-america-211051576.html>
> reasons
> <http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/jul/06/venezuela-nicaragua-offer-asylum-edward-snowden>,
> is so focused on these revelations - they were enthused about my
> partnering with O Globo, where it could produce the most impact. In
> other words, they sacrificed short-term competitive advantage for the
> sake of the story by encouraging me to write this story with O Globo.
> I don't think many media outlets would have made that choice, but
> that's the kind of journalistic virtue that has driven the paper's
> editors from the start of this story.
>
> This has been a Guardian story from the start and will continue to be.
> Snowden came to us before coming to any other media outlet, and I'll
> continue to write virtually all NSA stories right in this very space.
> But the O Globo story will resonate greatly in Brazil and more broadly
> in Latin America, where most people had no idea that their electronic
> communications were being collected in bulk by this highly secretive
> US agency. For more on how the Guardian's editors have overseen the
> reporting of the NSA stories, see this informative interview on the
> Charlie Rose Show from last week with Gibson and Guardian
> editor-in-chief Alan Rusbridger:
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130707/340b71e3/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list