[governance] caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting

[Norbert Bollow]

Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh at hserus.net> wrote:

> Norbert Bollow [28/01/13 16:05 +0100]:
> >Robert Guerra <rguerra at privaterra.org> wrote:
> >> - In the proposed schedule below I don't see where issues such as
> >> Cyber Security, Openness, Surveillance, Rights & privacy would feed
> >> into. Yes, they have been part of IGF's in the past, but they are
> >> still key issues of concern for all stakeholders.
> 
> These are already areas where multistakeholder organizations bring
> together industry, independent experts (civil society), some civil
> society volunteer groups in this space, and some selected government
> people .. and these are already active for years. Rather than
> reinvent the wheel, invite them over and then look at how CS can
> engage with them at their venues.
> 
> Especially cybersecurity - where there is the added concern that the
> vetting model fo some of the most effective groups and the sensitive
> nature of the content discussed mean that cooperation isn't very
> easy. Some organizations such as M3AAWG (www.maawg.org) do bridge the
> gap to a large extent, in outreach to a larger audience including
> ISOC, the RIRs etc.

How would this "invite them over and then look at how CS can
engage with them at their venues" process work practically in the IGF
context? Would this be a workshop?

Greetings,
Norbert

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t