[governance] today's Wash Post editorial

[William Drake]

On Jan 22, 2013, at 5:27 PM, Roland Perry <roland at internetpolicyagency.com> wrote:

> In message <50FEA64A.4090805 at itforchange.net>, at 20:16:34 on Tue, 22 Jan 2013, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> writes
> 
>> Why is it that even those who support US's decision not to sign the ITRs are not able to agree/ decide on exactly why did the US not sign the ITRs.

Some people were in the room and some people were not.  The ones professing to know beyond a shadow of a doubt what happened have invariably been in the second category.
> 
> It seems highly unlikely to me that there was just one easily explained
> paragraph in the ITRs that caused this.

Indeed.

Bill




-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t