[governance] Notice to the IGC on Proposed Charter Amendments

[Imran Ahmed Shah]

>In the IGC context, I would interpret an "abstain" vote not as a
protest vote but rather as saying "I care, but don't know the
candidates well enough to be able to express a preference".

If some don't know the candidates well enough, "Blank Vote" is the right substitute to cast a vote in favor/against or 'Abstain'.
 
>Our situation here is different from elections systems where it's
difficult to become a candidate and/or where it's difficult to
communicate dissatisfaction by means other than "protest votes". In the
IGC, if people want to protest against something, they can simply post
to the mailing list and explain the grievance. Therefore I don't see any
reason why someone would want to use the voting process as a means of
protesting.
 
Yes, I agree with you and could not understand that why someone would require 'abstain' voting option just to show any kinf of 'grievance' or 'to protest' against the system or candidates? Instead of the provisioning of 'abstain', the 'blank vote' may serve the purpose. 
 
Regards
 
Imran


>________________________________
> From: Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch>
>To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org 
>Cc: 'Imran Ahmed Shah' <ias_pk at yahoo.com> 
>Sent: Tuesday, 15 January 2013, 1:22
>Subject: Re: [governance] Notice to the IGC on Proposed Charter Amendments
>  
>Imran Ahmed Shah <ias_pk at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> With reference to the recently proposed amendment for the Voting
>> Options by adding "Abstain", whereas the abstention traditionally used
>> for an active & protest gesture and beneficial for the sake of
>> protesting against the system or candidates. 
>
>In the IGC context, I would interpret an "abstain" vote not as a
>protest vote but rather as saying "I care, but don't know the
>candidates well enough to be able to express a preference".
>
>Our situation here is different from elections systems where it's
>difficult to become a candidate and/or where it's difficult to
>communicate dissatisfaction by means other than "protest votes". In the
>IGC, if people want to protest against something, they can simply post
>to the mailing list and explain the grievance. Therefore I don't see any
>reason why someone would want to use the voting process as a means of
>protesting.
>
>Greetings,
>Norbert
>
>
>   
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130114/0578f622/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t