[governance] Re: a formal appeal request to the appeal team to reverse the recent ban on a Member

[McTim]

On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 11:57 AM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com> wrote:

<snip>
 rather as
> part of an extended pattern of communication to this list of which the
> particular incident in question was only one element.


Agreed.

Riaz and Parminder and others throw around tags like "neo-liberal" and
"neo-con" and "American Exceptionalism" where they do not apply.  They
are insulting to those who they are aimed at, mostly becuase they are
wildly inaccurate.

They don't get called on it, but when SRS says "gleefully posting",
those words get him banned?

That's the pattern.

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t