[governance] Appeal request Re: [] Updates on MAG 2013
Adam Peake
ajp at glocom.ac.jp
Sun Jan 6 22:24:54 EST 2013
Hi Avri,
Could you explain why an abuse. You've been something of a master of
the caucus' charter, would be good to understand more before +1'ing or
not.
Thank you,
Adam
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:19 PM, Avri Doria <avri at ella.com> wrote:
> I believe this is an abuse of the process.
>
> If 4 or more other IGC members counter-sign this message, perhaps with a
> +1, we request that the appeals team review this decision by the
> coordinator - as defined under the charter rules.
>
>
> avri
>
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro" <salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>
> To: "Ian Peter" <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
> Cc: "Adam Peake" <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>, <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>
> Subject: [governance] Updates on MAG 2013
> Date: Sun, Jan 6, 2013 19:54
>
>
> Dear All,
>
> Under the IGC Charter, the NomCom may be called upon to provide several
> functions. In this instance, the NomCom as Ian had mentioned had served
> previously to appoint the members of the Appeal Team. The NomCom was newly
> drawn to serve the IGC in appointing the Appeal Team and have existed for
> less than 12 months.
>
> In this instance, since we are to give our list of Nominees to the IGC by
> the 20th January, 2013, it becomes easier to use the existing NomCom. The
> election candidates will include an additional question about MAG
> Nominations which we will harvest and send to the NomCom, these persons
> will be asked to submit their brief bios to enable the NomCom to make their
> selections prior to the 19th January, 2013. This will then be posted to the
> IGC and sent to the UNDESA.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
>
>> I think using the previous Nomcom is the most practical path forward, but
>> above all I think leaving the process to the (single currently) Co
>> ordinator is what we should do. The current Nomcom is less than 12 months
>> old, has only been used to select an Appeals Team, and operated
>> effectively. Not all Nomcoms in the past have been effective, as most of
>> us
>> know, and I would prefer not to take the risk of a longer process that
>> might give us dubious results. We will be lucky to meet the deadline even
>> with the path of least resistance.
>>
>> Re numbers to put forward - I think we should be aiming at a large slate
>> of nominees rather than a small one, to cover all contingencies. We don't
>> know who will be rotated off, either in CS or with other stakeholder
>> groups, and as the geographic and gender balance needs to be achieved
>> cross-stakeholder, it is better for us to present more options ( the loss
>> of a North American woman governmental representative may well present an
>> opening for a civil society woman from that area, etc) So I think a larger
>> group of nominees might be praxctical.
>>
>> Ian Peter
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Adam Peake
>> Sent: Monday, January 07, 2013 2:54 AM
>> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org ; Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
>> Subject: Re: [governance] Updates on MAG 2013
>>
>>
>> Confirmed with the secretariat that the goal is to continue with
>> rotation, i.e. one third each year (plus or minus a few.)
>>
>> How many CS MAG members are there now, about 12? Perhaps look to
>> submit 6 names for the deadline?
>>
>> The members who joined last year only began at the May meeting. Hope
>> they remain. A few of the people we suggested then were selected, in
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
> http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
> http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list