SV: [governance] Brief report Re: Civil society representation at WSIS+10 in Paris

Fri Feb 22 11:46:30 EST 2013

Hi Anriette,

APC mentioned  "global public good"

4th draft of the ITU secretary general's report for the WTPF talks
about that <http://www.itu.int/en/wtpf-13/Pages/report-sg.aspx>,
bottom of page 7

quote
Today, the Internet is becoming “one of the basic commodities of life”
and various studies have cited the information and knowledge provided
over the Internet as examples of global public goods . The Internet is
comprised of many individual networks, although some networks (but not
always the content) may be the property of distinct groups, companies
or individuals. Applications such as the World Wide Web, E-mail, and
Instant Messaging have changed the lives of ordinary people in some
parts of the world. It is widely recognized that the utility and value
of a network increases with the square of the growth in the number of
nodes and users of that network.
end quote

The report references "Knowledge as a Global Public Good", Joseph
Stiglitz, <http://cgt.columbia.edu/files/papers/1999_Knowledge_as_Global_Public_Good_stiglitz.pdf>,
saying
"most observers agree that it is the knowledge and information
provided over the Internet which are non-rivalrous and non-excludable,
rather than the networks (which may be rivalrous and excludable)."

And then we have the uniquely assigned recourses that enable the
Internet to be what it is, IP addresses, domain names, AS numbers,
perhaps port numbers, and all that good stuff.

Anyway, there were a lot of good things on the CS proposals from that time.

Adam

On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 1:07 AM, Anriette Esterhuysen <anriette at apc.org> wrote:
> Thanks for all the support everyone.  And thanks for the inputs so far.
>
> Michael.. not sure when you and I will find time to organised our thoughts
> and everyone's inputs :) But lets try. Many useful comments have come in.
> Alon Bar's input sent to the IRP list also very useful.
>
> By some kind of 'research coincidence' I found this text on - APC's
> positions going into Tunis -  today on Wikipedia. Pasted below. I have no
> idea who put there, but it was really quite amazing to read it, and to
> remember suddenly the exact time and place when we drafted this text. I also
> remember when many of us still in this space drafted the Geneva statement
> "shaping information societies for human needs" (and that includes you
> Tracey!)
>
> The only proposal below that we have 'paused' is the idea of a
> 'multi-stakeholder' convention. We paused because we feared that any
> convention that could be negotiated would at the lowest common denominator
> level and might do more harm than good. It would be good to see what comes
> out of serious discussions on principles for internet governance and then
> reassess this.
>
> Anriette
>
> The second phase took place 2005-11-16 to 2005-11-18 in Tunis, Tunisia. It
> resulted in agreement on the Tunis Commitment and the Tunis Agenda for the
> Information Society, and the creation of the Internet Governance Forum.
>
> Just on the eve of the November 2005 Tunis event, the Association for
> Progressive Communications came out with its stand. (APC is an international
> network of civil society organizations – whose goal is to empower and
> support groups and individuals working for peace, human rights, development
> and protection of the environment, through the strategic use of information
> and communication technologies (ICTs), including the internet).
>
> APC said it had participated extensively in the internet governance process
> at the World Summit on Information Society. It says: Out of this
> participation and in collaboration with other partners, including members of
> the WSIS civil society internet governance caucus, APC has crystallized a
> set of recommendations with regard to internet governance ahead of the final
> Summit in Tunis in November 2005. APC proposed specific actions in each of
> the following five areas:
>
> The establishment of an Internet Governance Forum;
> The transformation of ICANN into a global body with full authority over DNS
> management, and an appropriate form of accountability to its stakeholders in
> government, private sector and civil society;
> The initiation of a multi-stakeholder convention on internet governance and
> universal human rights that will codify the basic rights applicable to the
> internet, which will be legally binding in international law with particular
> emphasis on clauses in the universal declaration of human rights
> specifically relevant to the internet, such as rights to freedom of
> expression, freedom of association and privacy.
> Ensuring internet access is universal and affordable. APC argued: "The
> internet is a global public space that should be open and accessible to all
> on a non-discriminatory basis. The internet, therefore, must be seen as a
> global public infrastructure. In this regard we recognize the internet to be
> a global public good related to the concept of the common heritage of
> humanity and access to it is in the public interest, and must be provided as
> a global public commitment to equality."[7]
> Measures to promote capacity building in "developing" countries with regard
> to increasing "developing" country participation in global public policy
> forums on internet governance.
>
> On 21/02/2013 05:22, Tracey Naughton wrote:
>
> Excellent choices!
>
> Tracey Naughton
>
> On 21 Feb 2013, at 3:36 AM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang"
> <wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de> wrote:
>
> This has my full support.
>
> wolfgang
>
> ________________________________
>
> Fra: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org på vegne af Norbert Bollow
> Sendt: on 20-02-2013 11:19
> Til: IGC
> Emne: [governance] Brief report Re: Civil society representation at WSIS+10
> in Paris
>
>
>
> Dear all
>
> As I mentioned before, Janis Karklins of UNESCO requested Marianne
> Franklin (one of two co-chairs of the Internet Rights and Principles
> Coalition) and myself to suggest speakers for the Paris WSIS+10 main
> sessions to represent civil society. In the absence of any really
> convincing answer to the question of who else should do this :-) we
> have done so.
>
> By necessity my participation in this process was not a formal
> nomination activity of the Caucus, which would have required a NomCom,
> and without a standing NomCom available for any tasks that might come
> up, there was simply not enough time for initiating a NomCom
> process.
>
> First there was the request regarding the opening session, and very
> recently the request regarding the other sessions. In each case a
> reasonably quick response was expected.
>
> I recommend that for future major events, a NomCom should be set up well
> in advance, and it should prepare well in advance with thoughts on
> potential nominees and selection criteria.
>
> For the current WSIS+10 event, a very much ad hoc process was used,
> where I have done my best to take into account the responses to the call
> for expressions of interest that I posted here on the list.
>
> I believe that we have a very good end result:
>
>
> Opening session:
>  Grace Githaiga
>
> "High level" session on Monday afternoon:
>  Anriette Esterhuysen and Michael Gurstein
>
> Closing:
>  Anita Gurumurthy
>
>
> I have also encouraged these civil society representatives to consult
> widely, as per the email message pasted below.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
>
> --snip------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Janis Karklins <j.karklins at unesco.org> wrote:
>
> I am writing to you with proposal to take the floor on behalf of the
> civil society
>
> Dear Anita, Anriette, Grace and Michael (the civil society
> representatives at the plenaries of WSIS+10)
>
> As you probably know, Janis Karklins of UNESCO had requested Marianne
> and myself to suggest speakers for the WSIS+10 main sessions to
> represent civil society. In the absence of any really convincing answer
> to the question of who else should do this :-) we have done so.
>
> Speaking just from my personal perspective right now, I would like to
> encourage all of you to consult widely on what are important points to
> make, using the mailing lists of the Internet Governance Caucus and the
> Internet Rights and Principles coalition and whatever other networks
> you're active in.
>
> Of course if you do that, given the great breadth and diversity of
> civil society, you're going to get more suggestions than you can use,
> and it's of course each panelist's discretion to select which of the
> points you want to mention and which of them you want to specifically
> emphasize and how much you want to add from your personal perspective -
> also taking into account what in your view may have been
> underemphasized by other civil society speakers.
>
> Overall (and I emphasize again that I'm speaking just from my personal
> perspective here), I think that it is particularly important to clearly
> draw attention to important points that have so far been largely
> overlooked or ignored in the IGF process and other WSIS followup
> processes.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------
> anriette esterhuysen anriette at apc.org
> executive director, association for progressive communications
> www.apc.org
> po box 29755, melville 2109
> south africa
> tel/fax +27 11 726 1692
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t