[governance] scope of "internet governance" discussions (was Re: Fwd: Why do US and EU trade negotiators hate the Berne Copyright Limitations and Exceptions...)

[riaz.tayob at gmail.com]

And legitimacy issues would be placed on which list?

...,...

On 20 Feb 2013, at 6:10 PM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:

> Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> 
>> McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> replied to Suresh, in reference to the
>> contributor who forwarded the message titled "Why do US and EU trade
>> negotiators hate the Berne Copyright Limitations and Exceptions...":
>> 
>>> He has confused "3 steps" with "3 strikes".
>> 
>> I understand that this kind of remark may be interpreted as being
>> funny, but I think that it is not funny at all when in a group there
>> are a few who are again and again targeted by this kind of remarks.
> 
> Oops it turns out, as Riaz has indicated, that what McTim had written
> was actually the truth and not, as I had thought, a bad joke.
> 
> My apologies for misunderstanding.
> 
> The other stuff that I wrote, that it might make sense to have a more
> technically focused governance mailing list and a separate one on
> broader governance of information society issues is of course
> independent of that misunderstanding.
> 
> Greetings,
> Norbert

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t