[governance] ¿Quien es responsable de esta desorganización?

Ginger Paque gpaque at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 13:23:26 EST 2013


Hola José... Somos todos los responsables :) Somos todos los miembros...
Será que culpemos a quienes no votaron ni si, ni no?

En vez de culpables, voy en busqueda de una solución. Qué propones?
Saludos,
Ginger

Hi Jose... We are all responsible. :)  We are all members...
Could we blame those who did not vote either yes, or no?

Instead of someone to blame, I am looking for a solution. What do you
propose?
Greetings,
Ginger

Ginger (Virginia) Paque

VirginiaP at diplomacy.edu
Diplo Foundation
Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme
www.diplomacy.edu/ig
**
**


On 18 February 2013 10:55, José Félix Arias Ynche <jaryn56 at gmail.com> wrote:

> ¿Se puede saber a quien o a quienes le toco esta responsabilidad? porque
> ahora nadie tiene la culpa de que estemos en este lió de reglamentos...
>
> No empleen el refrán de; Divide y Vencerás
>
> Lo que necesitamos es una; Enmienda al reglamento
>
> Estamos quedando ante los ojos del Mundo como cómo Desorganizados
>
> *Cordialmente:         José Félix Arias Ynche*
> *                        Investigador Social Para El Desarrollo*
>
>
> 2013/2/18 Deirdre Williams <williams.deirdre at gmail.com>
>
>> I usually find myself agreeing with Ginger and Izumi, but this time I
>> agree with Kerry.
>> If a group creates rules for itself then it should follow those rules, or
>> change them if the need arises, in the way that it has agreed.
>> And writing that first sentence gave me another perspective on the
>> earlier suggestion of transferring one's vote to a like-minded party. :-)
>> Deirdre
>>
>> On 18 February 2013 10:51, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for extension and reminder.
>>>
>>> izumi
>>>
>>>
>>> 2013/2/18 shaila mistry <shailam at yahoo.com>
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>> Shaila
>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>> * From: * Ginger Paque <gpaque at gmail.com>;
>>>> * To: * governance at lists.igcaucus.org <governance at lists.igcaucus.org>;
>>>> Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>;
>>>> * Cc: * Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>; Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro <
>>>> salanieta.tamanikaiwaimaro at gmail.com>;
>>>>  * Subject: * Re: [governance] Results of IGC Charter Amendment Poll
>>>> * Sent: * Mon, Feb 18, 2013 2:36:53 PM
>>>>
>>>>   I agree with Ian: I support extending the voting period and
>>>> reminding list members to vote as soon as possible.
>>>> Thanks gp
>>>>
>>>> Ginger (Virginia) Paque
>>>>
>>>> VirginiaP at diplomacy.edu
>>>> Diplo Foundation
>>>> Internet Governance Capacity Building Programme
>>>> www.diplomacy.edu/ig
>>>> **
>>>> **
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 16 February 2013 13:35, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> sorry if my last message wasn't clear - I am in favour of counting the
>>>>> existing votes as valid, and just looking to boost the numbers of votes
>>>>> count, rather than running the whole process again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Ian
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message----- From: Adam Peake
>>>>> Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 6:27 AM
>>>>> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org ; Ian Peter
>>>>> Cc: Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>>>> Subject: Re: [governance] Results of IGC Charter Amendment Poll
>>>>>
>>>>> Agree it would be helpful to know how many votes.
>>>>>
>>>>> But before re-doing the vote (how many times, until 'we' get the
>>>>> result we want?), could we have the amendments presented again.  With
>>>>> time for discussion, and then see if again there is support to hold a
>>>>> vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Adam
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Sala,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How many votes short are we of a positive result?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That would determine perhaps the best way to go.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In this case I dont think there is any great risk in re-opening the
>>>>>> vote to
>>>>>> get extra responses. The results in each ballot are clearly in favour
>>>>>> of the
>>>>>> reforms, the will of the caucus seems clear, it’s just a technicality
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> we have not had enough responses. (I would feel differently if on any
>>>>>> of the
>>>>>> ballots the no votes were roughly equivalent to the yes votes)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So I would suggest re-opening the ballot to allow those who havent
>>>>>> voted to
>>>>>> do so – accompanied by encouragement and reminders.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 10:17 PM
>>>>>> To: Ian Peter
>>>>>> Cc: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [governance] Results of IGC Charter Amendment Poll
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Ian and All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You are correct. I apologize to the IGC for the oversight, the
>>>>>> mistake is
>>>>>> mine.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As such, we currently have two options and they are:-
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Option 1
>>>>>> Accept from the votes that all the proposals have failed based on the
>>>>>> results of the votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Option 2
>>>>>> Re-run the votes
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If we take Option 2, we run the risk of setting a precedent for
>>>>>> extending
>>>>>> voting periods for other things that require voting including
>>>>>> coordinator
>>>>>> elections. Should we consider the current votes invalid and cast
>>>>>> fresh votes
>>>>>> or extend the votes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In any event, the current revisions to the Charter that are on the
>>>>>> website
>>>>>> will be reversed to reflect what it originally was.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the sake of completeness, the record of the votes is as follows:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 76 responses were submitted, though some respondents did not answer
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> questions, as none of them were compulsory.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On proposal 1, 70 voted in favour, 4 against, and 2 did not vote.
>>>>>> On proposal 2, 62 voted in favour, 5 against, and 9 did not vote.
>>>>>> On proposal 3, 71 voted in favour, 2 against, and 3 did not vote.
>>>>>> On proposal 4, 65 voted in favour, 3 against, and 8 did not vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you and Kind Regards,
>>>>>> Sala
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 9:59 AM, Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sala, are you sure?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The charter amendment process states that it is 2/3 of membership
>>>>>>> required
>>>>>>> for charter amendments, not 2/3 of those who bothered to vote. My
>>>>>>> understanding is that none of the votes result in charter amendments,
>>>>>>> because none of them had over 2/3 of members supporting. The relevant
>>>>>>> charter quote is below.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amendments to the Charter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This charter can be amended at any time as proposed by no fewer than
>>>>>>> ten
>>>>>>> (10) members and as approved by no less than two-thirds (2/3) of the
>>>>>>> members
>>>>>>> of the IGC. The membership requirements for amending the charter are
>>>>>>> based
>>>>>>> on the most currently available voters list. In amending the charter,
>>>>>>> everyone who voted in the previous election will be deemed a member
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>> amending the charter.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (perhaps it should be different but it isn’t on my reading)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ian Peter
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Salanieta T. Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 8:11 AM
>>>>>>> To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>>>>> Subject: [governance] Results of IGC Charter Amendment Poll
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dear All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Greetings! This is a brief update on the results of the IGC Charter
>>>>>>> Amendment Poll. Here are the results:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 76 responses were submitted, though some respondents did not answer
>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>> questions, as none of them were compulsory.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On proposal 1, 70 voted in favour, 4 against, and 2 did not vote.
>>>>>>> On proposal 2, 62 voted in favour, 5 against, and 9 did not vote.
>>>>>>> On proposal 3, 71 voted in favour, 2 against, and 3 did not vote.
>>>>>>> On proposal 4, 65 voted in favour, 3 against, and 8 did not vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This means that all proposals pass with greater than 80% approval,
>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>> is excess of the 2/3 requirement.  The text of the amendments is
>>>>>>> found at
>>>>>>> http://igcaucus.org/formally-**proposed-charter-amendments<http://igcaucus.org/formally-proposed-charter-amendments>and the charter as
>>>>>>> amended is at http://igcaucus.org/charter and
>>>>>>> http://igcaucus.org/nomcom-**process<http://igcaucus.org/nomcom-process>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would also like to acknowledge and thank you all for your
>>>>>>> contributions,
>>>>>>> elaborate discussion and for taking the time to vote. Thank you to
>>>>>>> all those
>>>>>>> who proposed the amendments and initiated the process and to all
>>>>>>> those who
>>>>>>> took part. Special thanks also to Norbert for conducting the Poll
>>>>>>> and to
>>>>>>> Jeremy for helping out.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With Kind Regards,
>>>>>>> Sala (on behalf of the Coordinators)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>>>>>>> P.O. Box 17862
>>>>>>> Suva
>>>>>>> Fiji
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Twitter: @SalanietaT
>>>>>>> Skype:Salanieta.**Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>>>>>> Tel: +679 3544828
>>>>>>> Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ______________________________**__
>>>>>>> ______________________________**______________________________
>>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>>>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/**unsubscribing<http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>>>>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/**info/governance<http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance>
>>>>>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/**translate_t<http://translate.google.com/translate_t>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro aka Sala
>>>>>> P.O. Box 17862
>>>>>> Suva
>>>>>> Fiji
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Twitter: @SalanietaT
>>>>>> Skype:Salanieta.**Tamanikaiwaimaro
>>>>>> Tel: +679 3544828
>>>>>> Fiji Cell: +679 998 2851
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________**__
>>>>>> ______________________________**______________________________
>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/**unsubscribing<http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>>>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/**info/governance<http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance>
>>>>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/**translate_t<http://translate.google.com/translate_t>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ______________________________**______________________________
>>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/**unsubscribing<http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>>>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/**info/governance<http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance>
>>>>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/**translate_t<http://translate.google.com/translate_t>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>>>
>>>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>>>
>>>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>>
>>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>>
>>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>                      >> Izumi Aizu <<
>>> Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
>>> Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,
>>> Japan
>>> www.anr.org
>>>
>>> ____________________________________________________________
>>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>>
>>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>>
>>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> “The fundamental cure for poverty is not money but knowledge" Sir William
>> Arthur Lewis, Nobel Prize Economics, 1979
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>> To be removed from the list, visit:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>>
>> For all other list information and functions, see:
>>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>>
>> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>>
>>
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>      governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>      http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>      http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130218/565b0362/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list