[governance] ¿Quienes votaron?

[Imran Ahmed Shah]

Your proposal is very good and is adopted in many organisations also has a legal value, where it is called as "Proxy Vote".

But as far as "Information Security" is concerned, the proxy option may be misused easily. Specially in virtual community cases where the physical identification is not available. 
------------------------------
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 12:12 AM PKT michael gurstein wrote:

>Based on this below, my suggestion for a process of "delegation" for voting
>would probably need to be formally renewed each year to be compliant.
>
> 
>
>M
>
> 
>
>From: governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org
>[mailto:governance-request at lists.igcaucus.org] On Behalf Of Imran Ahmed Shah
>Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2013 11:02 AM
>To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; Avri Doria
>Subject: Re: [governance] ¿Quienes votaron?
>
> 
>
>Dear Avri,
>
> 
>
>>I still believe that the voting list being pruned to the voters of the last
>election who had affirmed that they subscribe to the IGC charter, is a
>pretty serious purging
>
>Charter Affirmation is required to confirm and to remain as a IGC Member,
>and also related to the coordinators election voting.... or stated in the
>voting process as "Each person who is subscribed to the list at least two
>(2) months before the election will be given a voter account."
>
>But interestingly, under the "Amendments to the Charter", the definition of
>the membership and/or member for voting the charter is different than the
>voting member for election:
>
>"The membership requirements for amending the charter are based on the most
>currently available voters list. In amending the charter, everyone who voted
>in the previous election will be deemed a member for amending the charter."
>
>Even if there is any mistake to elaborate the membership definition, it is
>necessary to follow the Charter, however, this definition or confusion in
>the Charter may be amended through similar process.
>
>So, it is not I who tried to purge the list, I just elaborated what charter
>says.
>
> 
>
>I also understand that the voters list to cast their vote in Charter
>Amendment is not on the above basis, (only 106), but I used this figure for
>the qualification of the required 2/3 votes.
>
> 
>
>Imran
>
>From: Avri Doria <avri at acm.org>
>To: IGC <governance at lists.igcaucus.org> 
>Sent: Sunday, 17 February 2013, 22:32
>Subject: Re: [governance] ¿Quienes votaron?
>
>
>
>On 17 Feb 2013, at 12:16, José Félix Arias Ynche wrote:
>
>> Se necesita una depuracion...
>
>
>I still beleive that the voting list being pruned to the voters of the last
>election who had affirmed that they subscribe to the IGC charter, is a
>pretty serious purging.
>
>How many organizations require a yearly affirmation such as that?
>
>avri
>
>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>    governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>To be removed from the list, visit:
>    http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
>For all other list information and functions, see:
>    http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>    http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
>
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t