[governance] Civil Society (was Re: caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting)

[michael gurstein]

I didn't say that I don't have opinions.

M

-----Original Message-----
From: McTim [mailto:dogwallah at gmail.com] 
Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 8:45 PM
To: governance at lists.igcaucus.org; michael gurstein
Cc: Suresh Ramasubramanian
Subject: Re: [governance] Civil Society (was Re: caucus contribution,
consultation and MAG meeting)

On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:39 PM, michael gurstein <gurstein at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Suresh, I'm not the CS police or any sort of arbiter but FWIW to my 
> mind simply saying that you "support good antispam laws and on public 
> / isp education on Internet security" doesn't really make it "civil
society"...

In the second part of the above sentence, you did exactly what you denied
doing in the first part of the sentence!


>
> The question is what are the underlying values/public interest that 
> you are trying to achieve with or through "good antispam laws and on 
> public / isp education on Internet security".
>

Now you are being the CS judge and jury!

--
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route
indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t