[governance] Civil Society (was Re: caucus contribution, consultation and MAG meeting)

[Roland Perry]

In message <511F901A.3010301 at itforchange.net>, at 19:26:42 on Sat, 16 
Feb 2013, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> writes

>> So some opposing views (within civil society, because both stalker 
>>and  stalked are ordinary citizens and therefore members of civil 
>>society)  have not yet been resolved.
>
>I am not sure if I understand you when you say stalkers are civil 
>society.

Stalkers would no doubt align themselves with that part of civil society 
which values anonymity and free speech (which are both good when used 
for the good, but can also be used for the bad).

Most stalkers are ex-partners and other members of the public with a 
grudge; not "private sector", or "government", or "trade associations", 
or "academia" nor any other recognised 'stakeholder group', and can 
therefore only be members of "civil society".

(Or are they allowed to be outside of such discussions, as a 
non-stakeholder?)

As you didn't mention them, can I assume you agree that the victims are 
members of Civil Society?
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t