[governance] Re: caucus contribution -> possible replacement terms for NN?

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

If we do get into the net neutrality debate it would be wise to understand the facts and architecture about the debate first. The debate around it so far is buzzword laden and ideological, not just here but in popular tech media like ars technica

--srs (iPad)

On 14-Feb-2013, at 2:33, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:

> Am Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:01:26 +0100
> schrieb Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch>:
> 
>> Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 13 Feb 2013, at 14:20, Norbert Bollow wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Would the following be acceptable as a replacement?
>>>> 
>>>> “How to maintain the principle (sometimes referred to as ‘net
>>>> neutrality’) that the price which an ISPs charges their customer
>>>> for exchanging data packets via the Internet shall not depend on
>>>> the content of the data packets, nor on who specifically is the
>>>> remote party? What shall be the mechanisms and institutions
>>>> involved in this process?”
>>> 
>>> 
>>> It is close, though I think it needs some wordsmithing.  A
>>> suggestion:
>>> 
>>> “
>>> How to maintain the principle 
>>> 
>>> (referred to by some as ‘net neutrality’) 
>>> 
>>> that the price which an ISPs charges their customer for
>>> exchanging data packets via the Internet shall not depend on the
>>> content of the data packets, nor shall it depend on source or
>>> destination party?
>>> 
>>> How shall the  key architectural principle of best effort service
>>> for all user traffic in the global Internet be preserved?
>>> ”
>> 
>> Hmm a customer who exchanges packets will almost invariably pay less
> 
> Sorry, that should read "... a customer who exchanges MANY packets..."
> 
>> per packet than one who exchanges only a few, and I don't think that
>> that should be considered a violation of the principle in the first
>> of the questions.
>> 
>> So how about the following? (the only change is to replace "source or
>> destination party" with "the party with whom the packets are
>> exchanged") 
>> 
>> “
>> How to maintain the principle 
>> 
>> (referred to by some as ‘net neutrality’) 
>> 
>> that the price which an ISPs charges their customer for
>> exchanging data packets via the Internet shall not depend on the
>> content of the data packets, nor shall it depend on the party with
>> whom the packets are exchanged?
>> 
>> How shall the key architectural principle of best effort service for
>> all user traffic in the global Internet be preserved?
>> ”
>> 
>> Greetings,
>> Norbert
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t