[bestbits] Re: [discuss] [governance] Report from the BR meeting local organizing group - Dec 2013

Louis Pouzin (well) pouzin at well.com
Sat Dec 28 12:10:53 EST 2013


On Sat, Dec 28, 2013 at 10:28 AM, William Drake <wjdrake at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Thanks Parminder, glad we are able to agree on this.
>
> [snip]
>


>
> FWIW my view remains that if the networks involved refuse to work through
> the 1net mechanism to channel nominations to the Brazilians, they should
> not have taken positions on the 1net coordination committee, which to date
> has one identifiable function— channeling nominations to the Brazilians.
> If the view is that because its launch and initial expiation were not
> handled well 1net therefore has no legitimacy as a channel, then the
> networks shouldn’t lend it legitimacy and should resign from its
> coordination committee.  I don’t share that view of 1net, but if someone
> else does they should behave according to their principles rather than
> trying to have it both ways.
>
>
*+ 2*Louis

 Best
>
> Bill
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131228/03479e03/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list