[governance] 1net steering committee - civil society representation

Avri Doria avri at acm.org
Thu Dec 12 04:15:40 EST 2013


Hi,

This sends a good result. And the ad hoc process seems to work in the direction of inclusivity, especially since it no longer gives solitary decision making status to a broken caucus.

I am actually heartened that IGC and BB did not both participate, since until there is evidence from studies like Nnenna's, we cannot really consider them separate entities.

And it is a good list of names.
Avri Doria

Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
>I am pleased to announce the results of the civil society coordination
>group process to provide representatives on the 1net steering
>committee. 
>
>Our representatives will be
>
>
>  a.. Joana Varon 
>  b.. Rafik Dammak 
>  c.. Anriette Esterhuysen 
>  d.. Vladimir Radunovik 
>  e.. Anja Kovacs 
>With Marilia Maciel to fill any vacancy should any of the others find
>it impossible to continue.
>
>PROCESS –
>
>The selection committee was formed from representatives of the networks
>of NCSG (Robin Gross), APC (Chat Garcia Ramilo), Diplo (Virginia
>Paque), and Best Bits (Jeremy Malcolm).  Ian Peter was an independent
>facilitator. Internet Governance Caucus (IGC) was involved with the
>process and the call for nominations, but when its representative and
>sole co ordinator at this stage (Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro) withdrew
>at a late stage it was not possible to provide a replacement in the
>short time frame. Hopefully these difficulties within IGC will be
>resolved for future efforts (with IGC co ordinator elections due now).
>However, with 3 ex-coordinators of IGC involved with the selection
>process we believe its interests were fully represented.
>
>Calls from nominations were invited on the mailing lists of Diplo, Best
>Bits, IGC, NCSG and  other civil society networks. Diplo community
>undertook a process of narrowing its large pool of nominations to two
>names before consideration by other selection committee members, and
>the result of the various calls from various networks was that 13 names
>were considered by the committee. The final names were arrived at by
>consensus of all the representatives involved. 
>
>All of these representatives were chosen for their capacity to
>represent civil society as a whole, not just their individual
>organisational affiliations. We believe these representatives give a
>good cross section of the various interests of civil society in
>internet governance issues. 
>
>Ian Peter
>
>Independent Facilitator
>
>for Civil Society Coordination Group
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131212/7b6b5a7e/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list