[governance] [bestbits] HLLM in LOndon - CS reps
Marilia Maciel
mariliamaciel at gmail.com
Tue Dec 10 08:05:00 EST 2013
Milton is right about the (lack of) process. On the one hand, it is
positive that we have someone we trust there. On the other hand, it does
seem that they are including who they want and how they want, totally
disregarding the serious process we have been conducting to appoint names.
I think that a letter signed by all organizations that participated in the
nomination process should be sent to ICANN and ideally read during the
meeting, expressing our frustration and adding some concrete suggestions. I
come back to the points I made earlier:
- the agenda of the HL panel meetings should be publicized in advance
- channels to receive inputs (procedural or substantive) should be created
or clarified
- their meetings should be open to observers (like the meetings of the CSTD
ECWG)
- Reports of the meetings should be published. They could follow Chatam
House rules
And
- CS representatives (names), who were appointed following an internal and
legitimate process carried out by CS, should be immediately included in the
HL panel to ensure minimum CS representation.
MarĂlia
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Norbert Bollow <nb at bollow.ch> wrote:
> Milton L Mueller <mueller at syr.edu> wrote:
>
> > The distinction between Bill's appointment as an expert and the CS
> > groups' nomination of people to be on the committee is not so clear
> > to me, and we cannot assume that it is clear to Fadi, especially
> > since the London meeting of the group starts in two days. Either one
> > could be seen as Fadi making a concession to CS demands to be
> > included in the HLLM, and he may consider one to be a substitute for
> > the other. At this stage, I would assume that if there is no
> > appointment of another CS rep to the HL Panel by now, that there will
> > not be one at all, and Bill is all we will be given. The fact that
> > Bill's appointment came from a random F2F hallway meeting isn't
> > something that inspires confidence, is it?
>
> +1
>
> Especially given that there was in fact a coordinated civil society
> process through which names have been put forward.
>
> Greetings,
> Norbert
>
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
> bestbits at lists.bestbits.net.
> To unsubscribe or change your settings, visit:
> http://lists.bestbits.net/wws/info/bestbits
>
--
*MarĂlia Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora
Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator
Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate
www.diplomacy.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131210/e3bb7e53/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list