[governance] DMP} Statement on Process and Objectives for the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on the Future of Internet Governance

[Guru गुरु]

On 12/02/2013 11:05 AM, Lee W McKnight wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Belatedly joining the discussion again.
>
> First, agreeing with Milton we need to be precise about which -level 
> of analysis - and which - laws - we are talking about. As Karl points 
> out, again, California non-profit law is not bad; he only wishes ICANN 
> would follow it more closely : )
>

Whether good or bad, Californian law is CALIFORNIAN law.  When I have no 
role in making that law, why should I follow it (a very basic political 
principle).

(Dear Lee,
If I had not met/interacted with you, I would have thought you were a 
neo-colonialist:-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neocolonialism)

for developing countries, resisting digital colonialism is an important 
imperative, something global civil society could/should be sensitive to.

regards,
Guru







-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20131202/4fc06ee9/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t