[governance] WGEC - Questionnaire

[JFC Morfin]

On 01:46 13/08/2013, Salanieta Tamanikaiwaimaro said:
>>I agree with Norbert and McTim  - I'm against the idea of 
>>submitting a "corporate" response - although being able to see a 
>>profile/overview within the list of the range of  IGC members' 
>>replies might be helpful.
>
>Your view is noted. An attempt still has to be made by us to solicit 
>a corporate response, how that pans out is a corporate 
>responsibility. We merely are there to assist in facilitating a joint response.

I suggest that corporate responses would be an interesting 
contribution in a slightly different form. To describe and document 
what enhanced cooperation is from the civil society point of view, 
and document the current existing projects from this civil point of view.

1. When you consider what the "OpenStand" RFC 6852 actually is, this 
is the charter of a private sector led enhanced cooperation 
concerning the Internet architecture. My successive appeals to the 
IESG, IAB, and ISOC are – along with the rules of that enhanced 
cooperation – a way to make it answer how it intends to pragmatically 
cooperate with the other signatories, governments, other 
international organizations, and civil society.

2. While dealing with their chairs, my position is simple enough. It 
consists in considering that "OpenStand" (the paradigm for them to 
discuss and document standards) is to be completed by way of an 
OpenUse attitude (the way for us to discuss and document our user 
requirements). All of this is certainly NOT a supposed technical and 
academic concern (as in the questionnaire). It is a civil approach of 
the common human society from a simple digital thinking point of view 
(that may only initially be still more common among involved 
technical and academic people), where we need the enhanced help and 
cooperation of OpenStand, the ITU, and the UN.

3. Another example of enhanced cooperation is the management of the 
DNS CLASS "IN"  ("ICANN/NTIA") by ICANN with the GAC  the @LARGEs 
ALAC, and its membership in ISO/SG32 (for the maintenance of ISO 3166)..

Regards
  jfc  


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t