[governance] Digital restrictions management in HTML standards

[parminder]

On Monday 29 April 2013 04:10 AM, Avri Doria wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have personally signed and would support a statement if we could say something that like:
>
> "
> The IGC is ...*.
> The participants in the IGC support this petition.
>
> signed
> {set of those who endorse - individuals and organizational participants}
> "
>
> Any more and we would probably be involved in substantive issues.

Is a bar being put to IGC supporting and making substantive positions, 
and with that intention getting into discussing substantive issues... If 
so, it will be good to know. Apart from the fact that IGC has made 
substantive positions in the past, and endorsed those of others, making 
an explicit decision now not to do so any more makes it quite 
unproductive for many of us to spend a lot if time here.

parminder

>
> avri
>
> * do we have a canned "who the IGC is" stmt - or is that a substantive issue?
>
> On 28 Apr 2013, at 18:00, Norbert Bollow wrote:
>
>> What are the views about the idea of in addition issuing a brief
>> IGC statement in support of this petition or with a message similar to
>> it?
>>
>> Greetings,
>> Norbert
>>
>>
>> Ian Peter <ian.peter at ianpeter.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Many people here may wish to sign this petition.
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.defectivebydesign.org/no-drm-in-html5
>>>
>


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t