[governance] US House Bill to Affirm the Policy of the United States Regarding Internet Governance

[John Curran]

On Apr 26, 2013, at 11:23 AM, Andrea Glorioso <andrea at digitalpolicy.it> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:27 PM, John Curran <jcurran at istaff.org> wrote:
>  Agreed - I was not actually attempting to alter the current realities of international law and
>  relations, but suggesting that the enforcement of one country's public policies should not
>  _automatically_ be assumed (i.e. simply because of Internet-based communication to 
>  those in other countries) to be applicable to the other end of the communications.
>  (i.e. no more so then it would be today.)  
> 
>  That is a statement that actually is not accepted by some when it comes to the Internet, 
>  in particular those who would put obligations on entities in other countries to meet their 
>  own policy objectives...
> 
> In order to help me better understand, could you provide me with some examples of "enforcement of one country's public policy [which, in order to be effective, needs to be applied] to the other end of the communication" and/or of "obligations on entities in other countries [which are necessary for countries] to meet their own policy objectives"?

<http://torrentfreak.com/us-resume-file-sharing-domain-seizures-110201/>

FYI,
/John

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20130428/82d7ce66/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t