[governance] Conflicts in Internet Governance

[Roland Perry]

In message <EE3B826A-C712-430D-8D7B-A169444FA7E5 at difference.com.au>, at 
10:36:09 on Mon, 15 Apr 2013, David Cake <dave at difference.com.au> writes
>> Just to be clear, I don't think multistakeholder meetings *with a negotiated outcome* should be a learning experience *about the topic of
>>Internet governance* for any of the negotiators. It should be a place where differences of informed opinion are resolved, with participants
>>clear about what the issues are, even if they don't agree what approach to take.
>
>       A learning experience should never be the goal of such meetings, but it will be an inevitable side effect. Internet governance is
>evolving quickly enough that there is always something for us to learn.

Agreed. I have come away from such meetings with a much clearer view of 
the implications (eg) of Cloud Computing. But I'd be disappointed if 
many of the attendees arrived not knowing what Cloud Computing was, and 
intending to find out.
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t