[governance] implications of private TLDs

[Louis Pouzin (well)]

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:41 AM, parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>wrote:

>
> Today 'The Hindu' carried its own editorial on this issue, simply titled
> 'No, ICANN'....
>
>  parminder
>
> http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/editorial/no-icann/article3932668.ece
>
> - - -

India's interest for new TLDs is indeed relatively minor, with regard to
her population. Only 21 requests. Some strings tend to be quite generic:
IDN, INDIANS, STAR, STATEBANK. How they will fare in the ICANN screening
process, who knows ?

IDN is doomed, as it's Indonesia's code in ISO 3166-1 alpha-3.

Good luck. Louis.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120925/d6cf38e7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t