[governance] Big Porn v. Big Web Ruling Could Spell Trouble for ICANN / was Re: new gTLDs

[Riaz K Tayob]

Well if there is rejection of well established multilateral processes 
(WIPO, UN, WTO, Bretton Wood Institutions) as precedent to usher in a 
new era of control by the rich countries I guess then anything will do? 
Why be picky then if democratic and ethical concerns can be sidelined...?


On 2012/09/12 09:46 PM, Louis Pouzin (well) wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Chaitanya Dhareshwar 
> <chaitanyabd at gmail.com <mailto:chaitanyabd at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     (Kidding) Sealand?
>     http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Principality_of_Sealand
>
> An off-shore casino would be a logical HQ for ICANN ;-))
> Louis
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120913/d5375604/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t