[governance] Re: [igf_members] Proposal: Human Rights Roundtable

[Vanda UOL]

Believe the two points express clear the idea.

Vanda Scartezini
Sent from my iPad

On 20/10/2012, at 09:37, Izumi AIZU <iza at anr.org> wrote:

> Any views or comments?
> 
> Izumi
> 
> 2012年10月20日土曜日 parminder parminder at itforchange.net:
>> Dear Izumi/ All
>> 
>> I suggest that we request the organiser of the human rights round table to
>> 
>> (1) include social, economic and cultural rights in the background note and the discussions (if specific instances of such rights are needed we can mention, right to access/use the Internet, net neutrality - or the right to have the information, communication or content contributed by any one to the Internet equally as any other, linguistic and other cultural rights vis a vis the domain name system and so on). Also mention indivisibility of human rights as the WSIS documents do.
>> 
>> (2) Not to foreground consumer rights in a human rights write up. Preferably not to mention it al all, for consumer rights are not human rights. Certainly not in UN usage. 
>> 
>> Thanks and best, parminder 
>> 
>> On Friday 19 October 2012 06:16 AM, Izumi AIZU wrote:
>>> Dear Parminder and all,
>>> 
>>> I thought it is worth asking the list if we support this round table in general.
>>> 
>>> Whether consumer rights be part of Human right or not is of course important,
>>> and worth a debate.
>>> 
>>> While the organizer will have their position, I think we, IGC do not
>>> have to make a single position on this issue for support or not. As we
>>> know, there are different
>>> situations/contexts on consumer right issues around the globe, as well as access
>>> to Internet and other Internet issues, I think it is worth to have
>>> such round table
>>> and discuss in depth, rather than making one position beforehand.
>>> 
>>> best,
>>> 
>>> izumi
>>> 
>>> 2012/10/18 parminder <parminder at itforchange.net>:
>>>> Dear Izumi,
>>>> 
>>>> As you know I have submitted a detailed comment on this proposal to the MAG
>>>> list which I will presently forward. I havent got any response from the
>>>> organisers, which I still hope will come. I think we should wait for their
>>>> response before we can form a view on it. However, if you support the idea
>>>> whether any clarification is provided on my comments
>>>> or not, you can make the case for that here.
>>>> 
>>>> Best regards, parminder
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Thursday 18 October 2012 06:50 AM, Izumi AIZU wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Dear list,
>>>> 
>>>> APC has proposed this and I think IGC should support this.
>>>> 
>>>> Comments welcome.
>>>> 
>>>> izumi
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
>                      >> Izumi Aizu <<
> Institute for InfoSocionomics, Tama University, Tokyo
> Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita,          
> Japan
> www.anr.org
> 
> ____________________________________________________________
> You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
> To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
> 
> For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
> To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
> 
> Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20121020/c6e79071/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t