[governance] ICANN Net Address Endings to Face Government Objections

[Suresh Ramasubramanian]

Any stakeholder group is characterized by participation and non
participation .. which groups participate, which groups are entirely
unaware of it, which groups prefer to stay away and criticize it from
outside ..

Riaz K Tayob [21/11/12 09:50 +0200]:
>
>perhaps this raises the paradox of participation... which can equally 
>be a case for NON-participation in GAC than participation...
>
>If at first you don't succeed... try, and try again seems to be the mantra
>
>perish the thought that ICANN is not as even handed as its fan club 
>would like to think...????
>
>
>
>On 2012/11/21 09:17 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
>>ICANN has a new CEO and a lot more determination to listen to all
>>stakeholders since then
>>
>>Let us keep an open mind for now?
>>
>>Fahd A. Batayneh [21/11/12 07:50 +0200]:
>>>I would never disagree, but let us go back into history and 
>>>specifically to
>>>the ICANN San Francisco meeting when .xxx was approved against 
>>>the advise
>>>of the GAC. While the GAC made a
>>>statement<http://news.dot-nxt.com/2011/03/17/gac-statement-dot-xxx>part
>>>of which was "THERE IS NO ACTIVE SUPPORT OF THE GAC FOR THE
>>>INTRODUCTION OF THE DOT XXX TOP-LEVEL DOMAIN", the board never 
>>>listened. It
>>>was circulated that the board approved .xxx against the advise of 
>>>the GAC
>>>to push the New gTLD program forward.
>>>
>>>Statistics state that 4 of the industry's biggest players have a 
>>>say - in
>>>total - more than 80% of the New gTLD applications. If the GAC 
>>>opposes to
>>>several applications for each, will they agree and give those 
>>>applications
>>>easily? After all, they are the same players who invest heavily 
>>>in setting
>>>up posh booths at ICANN meetings.
>>>
>>>So who will prevail, GAC advise or the big guns?
>>>
>>>In general, this is where ICANN has been failing; i.e. working in 
>>>the best
>>>public interest. While some saw .xxx as yet another TLD, many 
>>>rejected it
>>>for various reasons.
>>>
>>>Fahd
>>>
>>>On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:00 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian
>>><suresh at hserus.net>wrote:
>>>
>>>>Sorry?  GAC is part and parcel of the icann process.
>>>>
>>>>--srs (iPad)
>>>>
>>>>On 21-Nov-2012, at 1:19, "Fahd A. Batayneh" <fahd.batayneh at gmail.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-20407906
>>>>
>>>>Kurt Pritz's resignations last week, and now this is sending 
>>>>the New gTLD
>>>>program to unknown destinations. I wonder if common sense or 
>>>>lobbying by
>>>>the big guns will prevail in the end.
>>>>
>>>>Fahd
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
>

>____________________________________________________________
>You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
>     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
>To be removed from the list, visit:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
>
>For all other list information and functions, see:
>     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
>To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
>     http://www.igcaucus.org/
>
>Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t