IETF WAS Re: [governance] Enhanced Cooperation (was Re: reality check on economics)

[Roland Perry]

In message <A2FCAA71-BDFF-4B9D-B8EC-86C77181E1DA at ella.com>, at 14:25:18 
on Wed, 23 May 2012, Avri Doria <avri at ella.com> writes
>> I would envision the body that is modeled on the IETF to not make the
>> final decisions, but develop a set of models of potential regulations on
>> these topics, with documentation of advantages and drawbacks of each,
>> and leave it to the relevant parliaments to make the choice between
>> them.
>
>I like this way of looking at it.
>
>I wonder, would willing countries, or other localities, need to try implementation of the regulatory models before they were actually
>recommended by the body? Or is this a part of the model (running code) that would not carry over?

Even if implementations of the regulatory models were tried in one 
country (and deemed a success) there is no guarantee it would be a 
success in another country.

If you think about regulatory models as software and countries as 
hardware, BGP software works on routers the world over because all those 
routers are fundamentally similar, but countries are very different from 
each other.
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t