[governance] our workshop proposal assessment results

[Izumi AIZU]

Dear list,

Last week, MAG made the evaluation of the all workshop proposals.
CS IGC's proposal, #85. " Quo Vadis IGF – or Evolution of IGF" was rated
as "green", top category with average marks above 12.0. which means
it is now accepted. It was also designated as "Feeder workshop" together
with another proposal, only two for "Taking Stock and Way Forward" designated.

(See: http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/w2012/proposals)

More than 120 proposals were graded and 32 got "green",
Though ours was bottom of the green on par with some 6 proposals.
The highest was 13.9 and lowest in the green, or ours, 12.0. Not bad at all.

Yellow is above 8.0 to 11.9 (need improvements to be accepted) and there
are some 80 plus. Red is basicaly "out",m which are below 8, lowest 5.5,
and are rejected unless very significant improvements are made.

I have received the attached email from the IGF secretariat, which asks
to take care of the followings.

2. Geographical diversity
3. Include members of the CSTD WG on IGF
4. Broader stakeholders diversity
5. Include regional perspective
6. Should involve youth
7. Gender-balance

And more details are asked, such as complete the Speakers list and
provide agenda, send background paper. Please see below for more info.

Any further comments and suggestions are very much welcome.

best,

izumi


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: IGF <IGF at unog.ch>
Date: 2012/5/22
Subject: IGF 2012 workshop assessment results
To: iza at anr.org


Dear Mr. Aizu

Thank you for submitting the proposed workshop  no. 85   to be taken
into consideration for the 7th Annual IGF Meeting to be held in Baku.
We are pleased to inform you that your proposal was accepted by the
Multi-Stakeholder Advisory Group (MAG).

The MAG has suggested to take into account the following in your proposal:
1. Deleting “or” in the title
2. Geographical diversity
3. Include members of the CSTD WG on IGF
4. Broader stakeholders diversity
5. Include regional perspective
6. Should involve youth
7. Gender-balance

Editing of proposals has now been re-enabled and we kindly ask you to
further update the proposal with the following information by 31 July:

1. A complete list of the panellists, indicating their status as “confirmed”
2. An agenda of the workshop
3.  Registering the panellists and uploading their biographies on the
IGF website, so that their information can be included in the
programme material. The panellists sign up form will be available
shortly.

If you have not yet assigned a remote moderator to the workshop,
please do so by 30 June.

It was also noted at the MAG meeting that there is a lack of least
developed and developing countries representation across all
workshops, we therefore encourage you  to include a panellist from
these under represented regions. Please note that a resource person
list is provided on the IGF website to assist workshop organizers to
reach a balance among their workshop panellists. You can access the
list at : http://www.intgovforum.org/cms/resource-person

Additionally, if you have not provided a background paper, we also
encourage you to do so.

We look forward to working together to make the 7th Annual IGF Meeting
a resounding success.

Sincerely,
IGF Secretariat

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t