IETF WAS Re: [governance] Enhanced Cooperation (was Re: reality check on economics)

[Avri Doria]

On 23 May 2012, at 03:57, Andrea Glorioso wrote:

> However, let me point out that although the IETF may not have a "monopoly"
> in solving these and/or similar problems, its supporters do tend to present
> it as the best option for Internet-related standards-setting and, therefore,
> one may infer that other options should not be pursued.

That was never my point.

If anything my point is that it works and while casting about the models that work, this one should not be denigrated and ignored.

I was also arguing that government people could be as qualified as anyone to operate in a IETF millieau.

I do not know how that became "IETF is the only model and all others should be ignored."

avri
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t