[governance] India's proposal for a 50 member UN committee for Internet Related Policies

[Roland Perry]

In message <aba77ccf-26f3-49cf-8579-c0feb9e52540 at email.android.com>, at 
08:01:59 on Fri, 18 May 2012, Avri Doria <avri at acm.org> writes
>Without getting into the discussion over the merits of the marketing
>campaign for Parminder's proposal, I  have to admit I just do not
>understand how turning over a process that according to the agreed
>langauge of the Tunis Agenda (paras 67-72) should be within IGF's
>scope to the CSTD or some other government dominated body increases
>democratization.

Nitin was always very clear that EC and IGF were separate processes.

The annual reports mentioned in para 71 have always been a matter for 
the CSTD.

The IGF has never been about producing a deliverable (an outcome), so is 
surely not suited, nor intended, to fulfil the role of the process 
mentioned in paragraph 70.
-- 
Roland Perry

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t