[governance] Anti-Counterfeiting: Richard O'Dwyer case: TVShack creator's US extradition approved

Riaz K Tayob riaz.tayob at gmail.com
Tue Mar 13 17:59:36 EDT 2012


13 March 2012 Last updated at 18:04 GMT


Richard O'Dwyer case: TVShack creator's US extradition approved
Richard O'Dwyer Mr O'Dwyer could face a maximum sentence of five years 
in prison if found guilty in the US


Home Secretary Theresa May has approved the extradition to the US of a 
student accused of copyright infringement.

The US authorities say 23-year-old Sheffield student Richard O'Dwyer's 
TVShack website hosted links to pirated films and television programmes.

A spokesman said Mrs May had "carefully considered all relevant matters" 
before signing the order.

Mr O'Dwyer's mother Julia, from Chesterfield, said he had been "sold 
down the river" by the government.

Westminster Magistrates' Court ruled in January that Mr O'Dwyer could be 
extradited.

The Sheffield Hallam University student said he was "surprised" when 
police officers from the UK and US seized equipment at his home in South 
Yorkshire in November 2010.

The case was brought by the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement 
agency, which claims that the TVShack.net website earned more than 
$230,000 (£147,000) in advertising revenue before US authorities 
obtained a warrant and seized the domain name in June 2010.

Mr O'Dwyer has argued that TVShack did not store copyright material 
itself and merely directed users to other sites, making it similar to 
Google.

He could face a maximum sentence of five years in the US.

Speaking to BBC Newsbeat, Mr O'Dwyer said: "I've done nothing wrong 
under UK law, and, it's pretty ridiculous isn't it?

"A 65-year-old man was extradited a few weeks ago, so if they can 
extradite someone that old they can extradite anyone really, couldn't they?

"Copyright laws differ between countries and that's yet to be fought, 
that argument."
'Life disrupted'

On Tuesday his mother said: "Today, yet another British citizen is being 
sold down the river by the British Government.
Continue reading the main story
Extradition analysis
Clive Coleman Legal correspondent, BBC News

This decision does not mean for a moment that Richard O'Dwyer is going 
to be put on a plane, now, today, tomorrow or the next week or so.

There will be a full hearing.

He is being extradited under the 2003 Extradition Act, this is the 
controversial act under which Christopher Tappin, the 65-year-old 
British businessman was also recently extradited. Gary McKinnon the 
alleged computer hacker, his extradition is also being sought under that 
act, and it is an act which many people say is a lopsided relationship 
which favours the United States.

If we want someone from there we have to show what they call 'probable 
cause', we have to present evidence. If they want someone from here they 
have to show 'reasonable suspicion'.

It's worth also mentioning that the offences that they want Richard 
O'Dwyer for are copyright infringement offences which carry five-year 
prison sentences in the United States - a much lesser prison sentence of 
two years in the UK.

"Richard's life - his studies, work opportunities, financial security - 
is being disrupted, for who knows how long, because the UK Government 
has not introduced the much-needed changes to the extradition law.

"The US is coming for the young [Richard], the old [Chris Tappin] and 
the ill [Gary McKinnon] and our government is paving the way.

"By rights, it should make for an interesting conversation between the 
Obamas and Camerons aboard Air Force One - but I'm not holding my breath.

"If Richard appears to have committed a crime in this country - then try 
him in this country.

"Instead, the home secretary wants to send him thousands of miles away 
and leave him languishing, just like Chris Tappin, in a US jail, before 
he has a chance to demonstrate his innocence, under British law, of the 
allegations made against him."

She added: "It's disgusting. Next time it may be your son. I urge 
everyone who cares about unfair extradition to write to their MP and 
insist this disreputable law is changed.

"We are now carefully considering all Richard's legal options."

The Home Office has clarified the time Mr O'Dwyer has to appeal against 
the home secretary's decision.

It said an individual had 14 days from the time of notification. In Mr 
O'Dwyer's case, that was on Monday, so the deadline for him to appeal is 
26 March.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-17355203


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t


More information about the Governance mailing list