[governance] NTIA says ICANN "does not meet the requirements"for IANA renewal

[McTim]

On 3/11/12, Carlos A. Afonso <ca at cafonso.ca> wrote:
> McTim, most of us do not "reject the idea that a fully
> internationalised, representative ICANN Board can fulfil this oversight
> function". But with yet another blunt demonstration that the USG has the
> helm and will not let go,

That's right, they don't appear to be able to let go, even if it is
probably the most enlightened US administration one is likely to get
in terms of Internet-y matters.  I think the "ICANN floating free"
idea is probably the most palatable one for them, and as a matter of
real- politick, one we could push for!

-- 
Cheers,

McTim
"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A
route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel

-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t