[governance] ECTF (was Re: Chinese preparing for...)

[Avri Doria]

To those supporting this, what does strong government participation mean?

- Participate as equals in a multistakeholder group?
- Be a majority in such a group?
- Have a voice that is more equal than the other voices?


avri


parminder <parminder at itforchange.net> wrote:

>
>On Wednesday 20 June 2012 10:10 AM, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Jun 19, 2012 8:45 AM, "Norbert Bollow" <nb at bollow.ch 
>> <mailto:nb at bollow.ch>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hmm... maybe the best available course of action will be to start
>> > with the ID based process, using it to
>> > a) create an input document for a WGIG like multistakeholder
>working
>> > group with strong governmental participation, and at the same time
>> > b) build credibility for the proposal to initiate such a WGIG like
>> > multistakeholder group.
>> >
>> > Does this sound reasonable?
>>
>> Yes.
>>
>
>With the comments given in my last email, yes, to me too, it sounds 
>reasonable thing to try out.
>parminder
>
>> Ciao,
>>
>> Andrea
>>


-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
     governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing

For all other list information and functions, see:
     http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
     http://www.igcaucus.org/

Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t