AW: [governance] "Oversight"
parminder
parminder at itforchange.net
Mon Jun 4 06:05:07 EDT 2012
On Monday 04 June 2012 01:17 PM, "Kleinwächter, Wolfgang" wrote:
> Wolfgang:
> One of the strength of the regulatory environment of the DNS system (as we have this discussed in our Summer School) is that it is based on a diversity of bilateral agreements which specifiy clearly what the contracting parties can do and can not do. With other words, if a problem appears which affects ICANN and/or any TLD Registry one has first to look into the bilateral contract. When Esther Dyson chaired the ICANN Board, this was called "regulating by contracting" and indeed, the diversity of the bilateral contracts give the whole system an additional stability.
>
> wolfgang
>
Wolfgang
You would know that the nature of contractual relationships between
private entities has very little bearing, if any, on enforcement of a
large majority of national laws. And it is the possible enforcement of
such laws of US on ICANN that we have been speaking about. ( The.xxx
decision being currently examined in a US court on anti-trust grounds is
a case in point.)
I also have no idea what you mean by "if a problem appears which
affects ... any TLD Registry one has first to look into the bilateral
contract. ". When all the .com based websites were seized by US gov on
IP related grounds what contract got seen??? No contract mattered, did
it. The websites simply disappeared.
For those who have been arguing that ICANN cannot remove individual
websites, that might be true, but they can remove complete domain names,
like cctlds, isnt it. (If in doubt about this, pl read the blog by the
CEO of Canadian Internet Registration Authority.) For us outside the US,
that is bad enough.
On the other hand, I am not completely sure what is the impact of the
recent securitisation of the DNS/root zone with regard to possible
domain seizures and other interferences, but I suspect that there are
indeed some important implications of it. It is the lack of capacity
outside well funded North based IG spaces that we dont have such
required analysis and information available widely. However, what little
I have gleaned from different sources makes me feel not too comfortable.
Those who seem to know about these things may share further
information.... parminder
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igcaucus.org/pipermail/governance/attachments/20120604/427ea691/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
____________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
governance at lists.igcaucus.org
To be removed from the list, visit:
http://www.igcaucus.org/unsubscribing
For all other list information and functions, see:
http://lists.igcaucus.org/info/governance
To edit your profile and to find the IGC's charter, see:
http://www.igcaucus.org/
Translate this email: http://translate.google.com/translate_t
More information about the Governance
mailing list